115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38467189)
1. A Methodological Study to Compare Alternative Modes of Administration With Value EQ-5D Using Preference-Elicitation Techniques.
Hill SR; Gibson A; Oluboyede Y; Longworth L; Bennett B; Shaw JW
Value Health; 2024 Jun; 27(6):784-793. PubMed ID: 38467189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K
Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off.
Jiang R; Shaw J; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
Qual Life Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1433-1444. PubMed ID: 33247810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peruvian Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L: A Direct Comparison of Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
Augustovski F; Belizán M; Gibbons L; Reyes N; Stolk E; Craig BM; Tejada RA
Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):880-888. PubMed ID: 32762989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
Purba FD; Hunfeld JAM; Timman R; Iskandarsyah A; Fitriana TS; Sadarjoen SS; Passchier J; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1243-1249. PubMed ID: 30314626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are Web-Based Valuation Surveys for Preference-Based Measures as Reliable as Face-to-Face Surveys? TTO, DCE and DCE with Duration.
Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2024 May; 22(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 38217791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report.
Mulhern B; Bansback N; Brazier J; Buckingham K; Cairns J; Devlin N; Dolan P; Hole AR; Kavetsos G; Longworth L; Rowen D; Tsuchiya A
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 24568945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.
Pickard AS; Law EH; Jiang R; Pullenayegum E; Shaw JW; Xie F; Oppe M; Boye KS; Chapman RH; Gong CL; Balch A; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):931-941. PubMed ID: 31426935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.
Ludwig K; von der Schulenburg JG; Greiner W
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Feb; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 28219389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility Values for Health States in Ireland: A Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.
Hobbins A; Barry L; Kelleher D; Shah K; Devlin N; Goni JMR; O'Neill C
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1345-1353. PubMed ID: 30051267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomised comparison of online interviews versus face-to-face interviews to value health states.
Peasgood T; Bourke M; Devlin N; Rowen D; Yang Y; Dalziel K
Soc Sci Med; 2023 Apr; 323():115818. PubMed ID: 36940582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?
Mulhern B; Shah K; Janssen MF; Longworth L; Ibbotson R
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 27021755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.
M Versteegh M; M Vermeulen K; M A A Evers S; de Wit GA; Prenger R; A Stolk E
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 27325326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L Value Set.
Purba FD; Hunfeld JAM; Iskandarsyah A; Fitriana TS; Sadarjoen SS; Ramos-Goñi JM; Passchier J; Busschbach JJV
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1153-1165. PubMed ID: 28695543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Valuing the EQ Health and Wellbeing Short Using Time Trade-Off and a Discrete Choice Experiment: A Feasibility Study.
Mukuria C; Peasgood T; McDool E; Norman R; Rowen D; Brazier J
Value Health; 2023 Jul; 26(7):1073-1084. PubMed ID: 36805577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How different are composite and traditional TTO valuations of severe EQ-5D-5L states?
Xie F; Pullenayegum E; Gaebel K; Bansback N; Bryan S; Ohinmaa A; Poissant L; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2016 Aug; 25(8):2101-8. PubMed ID: 26875190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Valuation of EQ-5D-5L in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A National Representative Study.
Al-Jedai A; Almudaiheem H; Al-Salamah T; Aldosari M; Almutairi AR; Almogbel Y; AlRuthia Y; Althemery AU; Alluhidan M; Roudijk B; Purba FD; Awad N; O'jeil R
Value Health; 2024 May; 27(5):552-561. PubMed ID: 38342365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the comparative feasibility, acceptability and equivalence of videoconference interviews and face-to-face interviews using the time trade-off technique.
Rowen D; Mukuria C; Bray N; Carlton J; Longworth L; Meads D; O'Neill C; Shah K; Yang Y
Soc Sci Med; 2022 Sep; 309():115227. PubMed ID: 35969979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Preferences and Data Quality between Discrete Choice Experiments Conducted in Online and Face-to-Face Respondents.
Jiang R; Pullenayegum E; Shaw JW; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
Med Decis Making; 2023 Aug; 43(6):667-679. PubMed ID: 37199407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
