These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38467727)

  • 1. Comparing body composition between the sweet-liking phenotypes: experimental data, systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Armitage RM; Iatridi V; Sladekova M; Yeomans MR
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2024 Jun; 48(6):764-777. PubMed ID: 38467727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Sweet-Liking on Body Composition Depend on Age and Lifestyle: A Challenge to the Simple Sweet-Liking-Obesity Hypothesis.
    Iatridi V; Armitage RM; Yeomans MR; Hayes JE
    Nutrients; 2020 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32899675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding sweet-liking phenotypes and their implications for obesity: Narrative review and future directions.
    Armitage RM; Iatridi V; Yeomans MR
    Physiol Behav; 2021 Jun; 235():113398. PubMed ID: 33771526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-evaluating how sweet-liking and PROP-tasting are related.
    Yeomans MR; Vi C; Mohammed N; Armitage RM
    Physiol Behav; 2022 Mar; 246():113702. PubMed ID: 35016967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sweet liker status in children and adults: Consequences for beverage intake in adults.
    Garneau NL; Nuessle TM; Mendelsberg BJ; Shepard S; Tucker RM
    Food Qual Prefer; 2018 Apr; 65():175-180. PubMed ID: 31320785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying and Characterizing Subpopulations of Heavy Alcohol Drinkers Via a Sucrose Preference Test: A Sweet Road to a Better Phenotypic Characterization?
    Bouhlal S; Farokhnia M; Lee MR; Akhlaghi F; Leggio L
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2018 Sep; 53(5):560-569. PubMed ID: 30016385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sweet taste liking is associated with subjective response to amphetamine in women but not men.
    Weafer J; Lyon N; Hedeker D; de Wit H
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Nov; 234(21):3185-3194. PubMed ID: 28762072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human hedonic responses to sweetness: role of taste genetics and anatomy.
    Yeomans MR; Tepper BJ; Rietzschel J; Prescott J
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Jun; 91(2-3):264-73. PubMed ID: 17477942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Associations between weight status and liking scores for sweet, salt and fat according to the gender in adults (The Nutrinet-Santé study).
    Deglaire A; Méjean C; Castetbon K; Kesse-Guyot E; Hercberg S; Schlich P
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2015 Jan; 69(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25074389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex response to concentrated sucrose reflects liking rather than sweet quality coding.
    Rudenga KJ; Small DM
    Chem Senses; 2013 Sep; 38(7):585-94. PubMed ID: 23828907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acquired hedonic and sensory characteristics of odours: influence of sweet liker and propylthiouracil taster status.
    Yeomans MR; Prescott J; Gould NJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1648-64. PubMed ID: 19180363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hedonic and sensory characteristics of odors conditioned by pairing with tastants in humans.
    Yeomans MR; Mobini S; Elliman TD; Walker HC; Stevenson RJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 16834490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of stevia liking by sucrose liking: Effects of beverage background.
    Oleson S; Murphy C
    Chemosens Percept; 2017 Sep; 10(3):49-59. PubMed ID: 33154787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial expressions and genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predict hedonic response to sweet.
    Looy H; Weingarten HP
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Jul; 52(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 1529017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking.
    Hayes JE; Duffy VB
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Sep; 95(1-2):77-87. PubMed ID: 18538361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hedonic response of sucrose likers and dislikers to other gustatory stimuli.
    Looy H; Callaghan S; Weingarten HP
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Aug; 52(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 1523245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associations between liking for fat, sweet or salt and obesity risk in French adults: a prospective cohort study.
    Lampuré A; Castetbon K; Deglaire A; Schlich P; Péneau S; Hercberg S; Méjean C
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2016 Jul; 13():74. PubMed ID: 27378200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling Associations between Chemosensation, Liking for Fats and Sweets, Dietary Behaviors and Body Mass Index in Chronic Smokers.
    Larsen BA; Litt MD; Huedo-Medina TB; Duffy VB
    Nutrients; 2019 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 30691090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phenol-Rich Food Acceptability: The Influence of Variations in Sweetness Optima and Sensory-Liking Patterns.
    Spinelli S; Prescott J; Pierguidi L; Dinnella C; Arena E; Braghieri A; Di Monaco R; Gallina Toschi T; Endrizzi I; Proserpio C; Torri L; Monteleone E
    Nutrients; 2021 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33800789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Associations between Psycho-Hedonic Responses to Sweet and Savoury Tastes with Diet and Body Composition in a Sample of Asian Females.
    Lim AJ; Teo PS; Tan VWK; Forde CG
    Foods; 2020 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32962029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.