These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38467759)

  • 1. Encoding contact size using static and dynamic electrotactile finger stimulation: natural decoding vs. trained cues.
    Henrich MC; Garenfeld MA; Malesevic J; Strbac M; Dosen S
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 May; 242(5):1047-1060. PubMed ID: 38467759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Novel Electrode Designs for Electrotactile Stimulation of the Finger: A Comparative Assessment.
    Garenfeld MA; Henrich MC; Isakovic M; Malesevic J; Strbac M; Dosen S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2023; 16(4):748-759. PubMed ID: 37801385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Impact of Size and Position of Reference Electrode on the Localization of Biphasic Electrotactile Stimulation on the Fingertips.
    Isakovic M; Malesevic J; Kostic M; Dosen S; Strbac M
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2022; 15(2):255-266. PubMed ID: 34995193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Evaluation of Tactile Sensation by Electrical and Mechanical Stimulation.
    Yem V; Kajimoto H
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2017; 10(1):130-134. PubMed ID: 28113382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Encoding of spatial patterns using electrotactile stimulation via a multi-pad electrode placed on the torso.
    Jure FA; Spaich EG; Malešević J; Kostić M; Štrbac M; Došen S
    Artif Organs; 2022 Oct; 46(10):2044-2054. PubMed ID: 35712803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference haptic stimulation and consistent quantitative tactility in transparent electrotactile screen with pressure-sensitive transistors.
    Lim K; Lee J; Kim S; Oh M; Koh CS; Seo H; Hong YM; Chung WG; Jang J; Lim JA; Jung HH; Park JU
    Nat Commun; 2024 Aug; 15(1):7147. PubMed ID: 39168999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Material Roughness Modulation via Electrotactile Augmentation.
    Yoshimoto S; Kuroda Y; Imura M; Oshiro O
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2015; 8(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 25794397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Static and active tactile perception and touch anisotropy: aging and gender effect.
    Abdouni A; Moreau G; Vargiolu R; Zahouani H
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):14240. PubMed ID: 30250244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lingual electrotactile discrimination ability is associated with the presence of specific connective tissue structures (papillae) on the tongue surface.
    Allison TS; Moritz J; Turk P; Stone-Roy LM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237142. PubMed ID: 32764778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of electrical and mechanical stimulation of the skin: implications for electrotactile feedback.
    Marcus PL; Fuglevand AJ
    J Neural Eng; 2009 Dec; 6(6):066008. PubMed ID: 19918109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnitude estimation of softness.
    Friedman RM; Hester KD; Green BG; LaMotte RH
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 191(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 18679665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding.
    Malešević J; Kostić M; Jure FA; Spaich EG; Došen S; Ilić V; Bijelić G; Štrbac M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noncontact Haptic Rendering of Static Contact With Convex Surface Using Circular Movement of Ultrasound Focus on a Finger Pad.
    Morisaki T; Fujiwara M; Makino Y; Shinoda H
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2024; 17(3):334-345. PubMed ID: 38039162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Embedded Electrotactile Feedback System for Hand Prostheses Using Matrix Electrode and Electronic Skin.
    Abbass Y; Saleh M; Dosen S; Valle M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2021 Oct; 15(5):912-925. PubMed ID: 34432633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tactile Exploration Strategies With Natural Compliant Objects Elicit Virtual Stiffness Cues.
    Xu C; He H; Hauser SC; Gerling GJ
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 31841421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual motion information modulates tactile roughness perception.
    Suzuishi Y; Hidaka S; Kuroki S
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13929. PubMed ID: 32811859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial coding of touch at the fingers: Insights from double simultaneous stimulation within and between hands.
    Tamè L; Farnè A; Pavani F
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 20933059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Force-Rate Cues Reduce Object Deformation Necessary to Discriminate Compliances Harder than the Skin.
    Hauser SC; Gerling GJ; Hauser SC; Gerling GJ; Gerling GJ; Hauser SC
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2018; 11(2):232-240. PubMed ID: 28641270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual-Parameter Modulation Improves Stimulus Localization in Multichannel Electrotactile Stimulation.
    Seminara L; Fares H; Franceschi M; Valle M; Strbac M; Farina D; Dosen S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 31675343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developing Non-Somatotopic Phantom Finger Sensation to Comparable Levels of Somatotopic Sensation through User Training With Electrotactile Stimulation.
    Chai G; Zhang D; Zhu X
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 May; 25(5):469-480. PubMed ID: 27323369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.