These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38467862)
1. Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review. Mahendran V; Turpin L; Boal M; Francis NK Surg Endosc; 2024 Apr; 38(4):1758-1774. PubMed ID: 38467862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings. Schreyer J; Koch A; Herlemann A; Becker A; Schlenker B; Catchpole K; Weigl M Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1916-1926. PubMed ID: 33844085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of non-technical skills in robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Wood TC; Rahman R; Bainton T; Ahmed J; Raza A J Robot Surg; 2024 May; 18(1):192. PubMed ID: 38693443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-technical skills in minimally invasive surgery teams: a systematic review. Gjeraa K; Spanager L; Konge L; Petersen RH; Østergaard D Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5185-5199. PubMed ID: 27066972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review. Boal MWE; Anastasiou D; Tesfai F; Ghamrawi W; Mazomenos E; Curtis N; Collins JW; Sridhar A; Kelly J; Stoyanov D; Francis NK Br J Surg; 2024 Jan; 111(1):. PubMed ID: 37951600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding and Assessing Nontechnical Skills in Robotic Urological Surgery: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of the Validity Evidence. Kwong JC; Lee JY; Goldenberg MG J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(1):193-200. PubMed ID: 29958854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and validation of a tool for non-technical skills evaluation in robotic surgery-the ICARS system. Raison N; Wood T; Brunckhorst O; Abe T; Ross T; Challacombe B; Khan MS; Novara G; Buffi N; Van Der Poel H; McIlhenny C; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5403-5410. PubMed ID: 28634630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cognitive training for technical and non-technical skills in robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Raison N; Ahmed K; Abe T; Brunckhorst O; Novara G; Buffi N; McIlhenny C; van der Poel H; van Hemelrijck M; Gavazzi A; Dasgupta P BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):1075-1081. PubMed ID: 29733492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review. Tesfai FM; Nagi J; Morrison I; Boal M; Olaitan A; Chandrasekaran D; Stoyanov D; Lanceley A; Francis N Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Aug; 103(8):1480-1497. PubMed ID: 38610108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-technical skills training for Nigerian interprofessional surgical teams: a cross-sectional survey. Alayande BT; Forbes C; Kingpriest P; Adejumo A; Williams W; Wina F; Agbo CA; Omolabake B; Bekele A; Ismaila BO; Kerray F; Sule A; Abahuje E; Robertson JM; ; Yule S; Riviello R; Isichei M BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):547. PubMed ID: 38755653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anesthesia Professionals' Perspectives of Teamwork During Robotic-Assisted Surgery. Myklebust MV; Storheim H; Hartvik M; Dysvik E AORN J; 2020 Jan; 111(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 31886556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Novel Approach for Engagement in Team Training in High-Technology Surgery: The Robotic-Assisted Surgery Olympics. Cohen TN; Anger JT; Kanji FF; Zamudio J; DeForest E; Lusk C; Avenido R; Yoshizawa C; Bartkowicz S; Nemeth LS; Catchpole K J Patient Saf; 2022 Sep; 18(6):570-577. PubMed ID: 35797490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-technical skills in robotic surgery and impact on near-miss events: a multi-center study. Manuguerra A; Mazeaud C; Hubert N; Eschwège P; Roumiguié M; Salleron J; Hubert J Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5062-5071. PubMed ID: 32968920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting workflow in robot-assisted surgery: a scoping review. Poulsen JL; Bruun B; Oestergaard D; Spanager L Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):8713-8725. PubMed ID: 35739430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and evaluation of a societal core robotic surgery accreditation curriculum for the UK. Boal MWE; Afzal A; Gorard J; Shah A; Tesfai F; Ghamrawi W; Tutton M; Ahmad J; Selvasekar C; Khan J; Francis NK J Robot Surg; 2024 Aug; 18(1):305. PubMed ID: 39106003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementing assessments of robot-assisted technical skill in urological education: a systematic review and synthesis of the validity evidence. Goldenberg MG; Lee JY; Kwong JCC; Grantcharov TP; Costello A BJU Int; 2018 Sep; 122(3):501-519. PubMed ID: 29603869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consensus guidelines on the bedside assistant skills required in robotic surgery. Brian R; Murillo A; Gomes C; Chern H; Oh D; O'Sullivan PS Surg Endosc; 2024 Nov; 38(11):6406-6412. PubMed ID: 39227438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Work-system interventions in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review exploring the gap between challenges and solutions. Kanji F; Catchpole K; Choi E; Alfred M; Cohen K; Shouhed D; Anger J; Cohen T Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):1976-1989. PubMed ID: 33398585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]