140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38467999)
21. Stability of engineered nanomaterials in complex aqueous matrices: Settling behaviour of CeO2 nanoparticles in natural surface waters.
Van Koetsem F; Verstraete S; Van der Meeren P; Du Laing G
Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():207-14. PubMed ID: 26164115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mapping the spatial distribution of the dengue vector
Rahman MS; Pientong C; Zafar S; Ekalaksananan T; Paul RE; Haque U; Rocklöv J; Overgaard HJ
One Health; 2021 Dec; 13():100358. PubMed ID: 34934797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Exploring the potential of in silico machine learning tools for the prediction of acute Daphnia magna nanotoxicity.
Balraadjsing S; Peijnenburg WJGM; Vijver MG
Chemosphere; 2022 Nov; 307(Pt 2):135930. PubMed ID: 35961453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Characterization of oxidative damage induced by nanoparticles via mechanism-driven machine learning approaches.
Wang X; Li F; Teng Y; Ji C; Wu H
Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 871():162103. PubMed ID: 36764549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Machine learning-based prediction models for home discharge in patients with COVID-19: Development and evaluation using electronic health records.
Zapata RD; Huang S; Morris E; Wang C; Harle C; Magoc T; Mardini M; Loftus T; Modave F
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292888. PubMed ID: 37862334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Metal-based engineered nanoparticles in the drinking water treatment systems: A critical review.
Sousa VS; Ribau Teixeira M
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Mar; 707():136077. PubMed ID: 31863978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of Plant Uptake and Translocation of Engineered Metallic Nanoparticles by Machine Learning.
Wang X; Liu L; Zhang W; Ma X
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jun; 55(11):7491-7500. PubMed ID: 33999596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Insight interactions of engineered nanoparticles with aquatic higher plants for phytoaccumulation, phytotoxicity, and phytoremediation applications: A review.
Sukul U; Das K; Chen JS; Sharma RK; Dey G; Banerjee P; Taharia M; Lee CI; Maity JP; Lin PY; Chen CY
Aquat Toxicol; 2023 Nov; 264():106713. PubMed ID: 37866164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Artificial intelligence in clinical care amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.
Adamidi ES; Mitsis K; Nikita KS
Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2021; 19():2833-2850. PubMed ID: 34025952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Application of a developed triple-classification machine learning model for carcinogenic prediction of hazardous organic chemicals to the US, EU, and WHO based on Chinese database.
Hao N; Sun P; Zhao W; Li X
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2023 Apr; 255():114806. PubMed ID: 36948010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Potential toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in mammalian germ cells and developing embryos: treatment strategies and anticipated applications of nanoparticles in gene delivery.
Das J; Choi YJ; Song H; Kim JH
Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Sep; 22(5):588-619. PubMed ID: 27385359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Aquatic Ecotoxicity Testing of Nanoparticles-The Quest To Disclose Nanoparticle Effects.
Skjolding LM; Sørensen SN; Hartmann NB; Hjorth R; Hansen SF; Baun A
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2016 Dec; 55(49):15224-15239. PubMed ID: 27564250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mortality risk prediction in burn injury: Comparison of logistic regression with machine learning approaches.
Stylianou N; Akbarov A; Kontopantelis E; Buchan I; Dunn KW
Burns; 2015 Aug; 41(5):925-34. PubMed ID: 25931158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prediction of pulmonary pressure after Glenn shunts by computed tomography-based machine learning models.
Huang L; Li J; Huang M; Zhuang J; Yuan H; Jia Q; Zeng D; Que L; Xi Y; Lin J; Dong Y
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 31705256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Machine learning-based models for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence risk.
Zuo D; Yang L; Jin Y; Qi H; Liu Y; Ren L
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Nov; 23(1):276. PubMed ID: 38031071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Developing random forest based QSAR models for predicting the mixture toxicity of TiO
Trinh TX; Seo M; Yoon TH; Kim J
NanoImpact; 2022 Jan; 25():100383. PubMed ID: 35559889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interactions of metal-based engineered nanoparticles with aquatic higher plants: A review of the state of current knowledge.
Thwala M; Klaine SJ; Musee N
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1677-94. PubMed ID: 26757140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The co-occurrence of Zn-and Cu-based engineered nanoparticles in soils: The metal extractability vs. toxicity to Folsomia candida.
Jośko I; Krasucka P; Skwarek E; Oleszczuk P; Sheteiwy M
Chemosphere; 2022 Jan; 287(Pt 3):132252. PubMed ID: 34555583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predictive modeling of consumer purchase behavior on social media: Integrating theory of planned behavior and machine learning for actionable insights.
Azad MS; Khan SS; Hossain R; Rahman R; Momen S
PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0296336. PubMed ID: 38150431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
