These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38469439)
1. X-Ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part III: Sensitivity to Detector Geometry and Rotation Stage Errors at Different Magnifications. Jaganmohan P; Muralikrishnan B; Shilling M; Morse E J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2021; 126():126029. PubMed ID: 38469439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. X-ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part I: Sensitivity to Detector Geometry Errors. Muralikrishnan B; Shilling M; Phillips S; Ren W; Lee V; Kim F J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2019; 124():1-16. PubMed ID: 34877158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. X-ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part II: Sensitivity to Rotation Stage Errors. Muralikrishnan B; Shilling M; Phillips S; Ren W; Lee V; Kim F J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2019; 124():1-13. PubMed ID: 34877154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ASME B89.4.23 Performance Evaluation Tests and Geometry Errors in X-Ray Computed Tomography Systems. Muralikrishnan B; Shilling M; Lee V J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2021; 126():126042. PubMed ID: 38469444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems. Cho Y; Moseley DJ; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):968-83. PubMed ID: 15895580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of CT cone-beam geometry using a novel method insensitive to phantom fabrication inaccuracy: implications for isocenter localization accuracy. Ford JC; Zheng D; Williamson JF Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2829-40. PubMed ID: 21815358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance Evaluation of Terrestrial Laser Scanners - A Review. Muralikrishnan B Meas Sci Technol; 2021; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 34326574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The geometric calibration of cone-beam systems with arbitrary geometry. Robert N; Watt KN; Wang X; Mainprize JG Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):7239-61. PubMed ID: 19926916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tolerance to geometrical inaccuracies in CBCT systems: A comprehensive study. Abella M; Martinez C; Garcia I; Moreno P; De Molina C; Desco M Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):6007-6019. PubMed ID: 34213782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geometric calibration of a mobile C-arm for intraoperative cone-beam CT. Daly MJ; Siewerdsen JH; Cho YB; Jaffray DA; Irish JC Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2124-36. PubMed ID: 18561688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A line-source method for aligning on-board and other pinhole SPECT systems. Yan S; Bowsher J; Yin FF Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122501. PubMed ID: 24320537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Review of high energy x-ray computed tomography for non-destructive dimensional metrology of large metallic advanced manufactured components. Sun W; Symes DR; Brenner CM; Böhnel M; Brown S; Mavrogordato MN; Sinclair I; Salamon M Rep Prog Phys; 2022 Feb; 85(1):. PubMed ID: 35138267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ASME B89.4.19 Performance Evaluation Tests and Geometric Misalignments in Laser Trackers. Muralikrishnan B; Sawyer D; Blackburn C; Phillips S; Borchardt B; Estler WT J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2009; 114(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 27504211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Online geometry calibration for retrofit computed tomography from a mouse rotation system and a small-animal imager. Zhou H; Reeves S; Chou CY; Brannen A; Panizzi P Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 50(1):192-208. PubMed ID: 36039982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnification-driven B-spline interpolation for cone-beam projection and backprojection. Savanier M; Riddell C; Trousset Y; Chouzenoux E; Pesquet JC Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):6339-6361. PubMed ID: 34423442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between x-ray illumination field size and flat field intensity and its impacts on x-ray imaging. Dong X; Niu T; Jia X; Zhu L Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5901-9. PubMed ID: 23039629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cone-beam imaging with tilted rotation axis: Method and performance evaluation. Zhao C; Herbst M; Vogt S; Ritschl L; Kappler S; Siewerdsen JH; Zbijewski W Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3305-3320. PubMed ID: 32340069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)]. ; ; Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]