BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

38 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38471373)

  • 1. Critical review of the SHAPE trial.
    Dursun P; Gültekin M
    Turk J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jun; 21(2):131-132. PubMed ID: 38853510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical analysis of 314 patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion who underwent total hysterectomy directly: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study.
    Lei L; Zhang L; Zheng Y; Ma W; Liu F; Li D; Chen K; Zeng Y
    BMC Cancer; 2024 May; 24(1):575. PubMed ID: 38724921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety analysis of non-radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (IA2 ~ IB1): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zeng S; Xiao S; Xu Y; Yang P; Hu C; Jin X; Liu L
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1337752. PubMed ID: 38745744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
    Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IA1 with LVSI, IA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 1 trial.
    Wu X; Feng H; Gao S; Feng H; Diao W; Zhang H; Du M; Lou W; Wang X; Zhu T; Zhang Y; Hu W; Xue X; Zhu Z; Xiang L; Li J; Fang X; Bai Y; Hou Y; Yan W; Qiu L; Yu H; Zhu S; Du Y; Jiang H
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Apr; 22(1):384. PubMed ID: 35397576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Taliento C; Scutiero G; Arcieri M; Pellecchia G; Tius V; Bogani G; Petrillo M; Pavone M; Bizzarri N; Driul L; Greco P; Scambia G; Restaino S; Vizzielli G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 50(4):108252. PubMed ID: 38471373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).
    Kietpeerakool C; Aue-Aungkul A; Galaal K; Ngamjarus C; Lumbiganon P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 2(2):CD012828. PubMed ID: 30746689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Kokka F; Bryant A; Brockbank E; Powell M; Oram D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; (4):CD010260. PubMed ID: 25847525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhao Y; Hang B; Xiong GW; Zhang XW
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1132-1144. PubMed ID: 28300465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short- and long term outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
    Prodromidou A; Iavazzo C; Fotiou A; Psomiadou V; Douligeris A; Vorgias G; Kalinoglou N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jul; 300(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 31062151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.