115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38471998)
1. Cardiac 2-D Shear Wave Imaging Using a New Dedicated Clinical Ultrasound System: A Phantom Study.
Saloux E; Garrec ML; Menet N; Dillon L; Simard C; Fraschini C; Manrique A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Jun; 50(6):843-851. PubMed ID: 38471998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superficial ultrasound shear wave speed measurements in soft and hard elasticity phantoms: repeatability and reproducibility using two ultrasound systems.
Dillman JR; Chen S; Davenport MS; Zhao H; Urban MW; Song P; Watcharotone K; Carson PL
Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):376-85. PubMed ID: 25249389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of commercial and non-commercial shear wave elastography implementations for vascular applications.
Pruijssen JT; Schreuder FHBM; Wilbers J; Kaanders JHAM; de Korte CL; Hansen HHG
Ultrasonics; 2024 May; 140():107312. PubMed ID: 38599075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 2 shear wave elastography systems in reproducibility and accuracy using an elasticity phantom.
Woo JH; Ko EY; Han BK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(15):e24921. PubMed ID: 33847610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A New Criterion for Shear Wave Elastometric Assessment Using Modulus of Stiffness Difference between Object and Environment.
Demin IY; Rykhtik PI; Spivak АE; Safonov DV
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2022; 14(5):5-13. PubMed ID: 37181832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 2-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastographic Measurements Using ElastQ Imaging and SuperSonic Shear Imaging: Phantom Study and Clinical Pilot Study.
Hwang J; Yoon HM; Jung AY; Lee JS; Cho YA
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Feb; 39(2):311-321. PubMed ID: 31392769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of shear wave velocity measurements assessed with two different ultrasound systems in an ex-vivo tendon strain phantom.
Rosskopf AB; Bachmann E; Snedeker JG; Pfirrmann CW; Buck FM
Skeletal Radiol; 2016 Nov; 45(11):1541-51. PubMed ID: 27631078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of oil-in-gelatin phantoms for viscoelasticity measurement in ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Nguyen MM; Zhou S; Robert JL; Shamdasani V; Xie H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 24139915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motion effects on the measurement of stiffness on ultrasound shear wave elastography: a moving liver fibrosis phantom study.
Shin HJ; Kim MJ; Yoon CS; Lee K; Lee KS; Park JC; Lee MJ; Yoon H
Med Ultrason; 2018 Feb; 1(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 29400362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Study of ultrasound stiffness imaging methods using tissue mimicking phantoms.
Manickam K; Machireddy RR; Seshadri S
Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):621-31. PubMed ID: 24083832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical acceptance testing and scanner comparison of ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Long Z; Tradup DJ; Song P; Stekel SF; Chen S; Glazebrook KN; Hangiandreou NJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):336-342. PubMed ID: 29542277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Normal values of liver shear wave velocity in healthy children assessed by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging using a convex probe and a linear probe.
Fontanilla T; Cañas T; Macia A; Alfageme M; Gutierrez Junquera C; Malalana A; Luz Cilleruelo M; Roman E; Miralles M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):470-7. PubMed ID: 24361222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeatability and Agreement of Shear Wave Speed Measurements in Phantoms and Human Livers Across 6 Ultrasound 2-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Systems.
Gilligan LA; Trout AT; Bennett P; Dillman JR
Invest Radiol; 2020 Apr; 55(4):191-199. PubMed ID: 31977604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study.
Kishimoto R; Suga M; Koyama A; Omatsu T; Tachibana Y; Ebner DK; Obata T
BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e013925. PubMed ID: 28057657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility and Diagnostic Accuracy of Supersonic Shear-Wave Elastography for the Assessment of Liver Stiffness and Liver Fibrosis in Children: A Pilot Study of 96 Patients.
Franchi-Abella S; Corno L; Gonzales E; Antoni G; Fabre M; Ducot B; Pariente D; Gennisson JL; Tanter M; Corréas JM
Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 26305193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of Shear Wave Elastography Cutoff Values on the Supersonic Aixplorer for Practical Clinical Use in Liver Fibrosis Staging.
Dhyani M; Grajo JR; Bhan AK; Corey K; Chung R; Samir AE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 28341490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus.
Pagé G; Bied M; Garteiser P; Van Beers B; Etaix N; Fraschini C; Bel-Brunon A; Gennisson JL
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(20):. PubMed ID: 37703895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses.
Evans A; Whelehan P; Thomson K; McLean D; Brauer K; Purdie C; Jordan L; Baker L; Thompson A
Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(6):R104. PubMed ID: 21122101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arterial Stiffness Estimation by Shear Wave Elastography: Validation in Phantoms with Mechanical Testing.
Maksuti E; Widman E; Larsson D; Urban MW; Larsson M; Bjällmark A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):308-21. PubMed ID: 26454623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
