67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38472286)
1. Analysis of the load on the knee joint and vertebral column with changes in squatting depth and weight load.
Hartmann H; Wirth K; Klusemann M
Sports Med; 2013 Oct; 43(10):993-1008. PubMed ID: 23821469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing risk assessment methods for work-related musculoskeletal disorders with in vivo joint loads during manual materials handling.
Brandl C; Bender A; Schmachtenberg T; Dymke J; Damm P
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6041. PubMed ID: 38472286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo load on knee, hip and spine during manual materials handling with two lifting techniques.
Bender A; Schmidt H; Wellner DL; Duda GN; Brandl C; Damm P
J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111963. PubMed ID: 38286711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An empirical comparison of OWAS, RULA and REBA based on self-reported discomfort.
Kee D
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2020 Jun; 26(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 31941428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo loads on a vertebral body replacement during different lifting techniques.
Dreischarf M; Rohlmann A; Graichen F; Bergmann G; Schmidt H
J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 26603872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study.
Dehghan P; Arjmand N
Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interventions to prevent and reduce work-related musculoskeletal injuries and pain among healthcare professionals. A comprehensive systematic review of the literature.
Albanesi B; Piredda M; Bravi M; Bressi F; Gualandi R; Marchetti A; Facchinetti G; Ianni A; Cordella F; Zollo L; De Marinis MG
J Safety Res; 2022 Sep; 82():124-143. PubMed ID: 36031239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lifting Techniques: Why Are We Not Using Evidence To Optimize Movement?
Washmuth NB; McAfee AD; Bickel CS
Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2022; 17(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 35024210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review.
Kee D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why cumulative loading calculated using non-weighted integration may not be suitable for assessing physical stress of the lower back: an empirical investigation of strain during lifting and lowering tasks.
Johnen L; Mertens A; Nitsch V; Brandl C
Ergonomics; 2022 Jan; 65(1):134-146. PubMed ID: 34427545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating a wearable biofeedback device for reducing end-range sagittal lumbar spine flexion among home caregivers.
Kamachi M; Owlia M; Dutta T
Appl Ergon; 2021 Nov; 97():103547. PubMed ID: 34365286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of load on the lumbar spine using two computerised packages and REBA method.
Tokarski TM; Roman-Liu D
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2020; 22(3):43-53. PubMed ID: 33518725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
