228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38472531)
1. Large language models and bariatric surgery patient education: a comparative readability analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, and online institutional resources.
Srinivasan N; Samaan JS; Rajeev ND; Kanu MU; Yeo YH; Samakar K
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2522-2532. PubMed ID: 38472531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the Application of Large Language Models in Generating Dermatologic Patient Education Materials According to Reading Level: Qualitative Study.
Lambert R; Choo ZY; Gradwohl K; Schroedl L; Ruiz De Luzuriaga A
JMIR Dermatol; 2024 May; 7():e55898. PubMed ID: 38754096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spanish-language bariatric surgery patient education materials fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability.
Padilla G; Awshah S; Mhaskar RS; Diab AF; Sujka JA; DuCoin C; Docimo S
Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6417-6428. PubMed ID: 37129638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Aortic Stenosis? A Pilot Study.
Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Yolchieva L; Saleh Z; Joshi H; Moccia MC; Suarez-Pierre A; Han JJ
Cardiol Ther; 2024 Mar; 13(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 38194058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using Large Language Models to Generate Educational Materials on Childhood Glaucoma.
Dihan Q; Chauhan MZ; Eleiwa TK; Hassan AK; Sallam AB; Khouri AS; Chang TC; Elhusseiny AM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; 265():28-38. PubMed ID: 38614196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benchmarking large language models' performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard.
Lim ZW; Pushpanathan K; Yew SME; Lai Y; Sun CH; Lam JSH; Chen DZ; Goh JHL; Tan MCJ; Sheng B; Cheng CY; Koh VTC; Tham YC
EBioMedicine; 2023 Sep; 95():104770. PubMed ID: 37625267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Harnessing artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, Bing, and Bard in generating clinician-level bariatric surgery recommendations.
Lee Y; Shin T; Tessier L; Javidan A; Jung J; Hong D; Strong AT; McKechnie T; Malone S; Jin D; Kroh M; Dang JT; ;
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38644078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dr. Google vs. Dr. ChatGPT: Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology by Comparing the Accuracy, Safety, and Readability of Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions Regarding Cataracts and Cataract Surgery.
Cohen SA; Brant A; Fisher AC; Pershing S; Do D; Pan C
Semin Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38516983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based potential of generative artificial intelligence large language models in orthodontics: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
Makrygiannakis MA; Giannakopoulos K; Kaklamanos EG
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38613510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing Ophthalmology Patient Education via ChatBot-Generated Materials: Readability Analysis of AI-Generated Patient Education Materials and The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Patient Brochures.
Eid K; Eid A; Wang D; Raiker RS; Chen S; Nguyen J
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 40(2):212-216. PubMed ID: 37972974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the Performance of Popular Large Language Models on the National Board of Medical Examiners Sample Questions.
Abbas A; Rehman MS; Rehman SS
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e55991. PubMed ID: 38606229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Bard on a Neurosurgery Oral Boards Preparation Question Bank.
Ali R; Tang OY; Connolly ID; Fridley JS; Shin JH; Zadnik Sullivan PL; Cielo D; Oyelese AA; Doberstein CE; Telfeian AE; Gokaslan ZL; Asaad WF
Neurosurgery; 2023 Nov; 93(5):1090-1098. PubMed ID: 37306460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.
Samuel D; Vilardo N; Isani SS; Kuo DYS; Gressel GM
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):616-621. PubMed ID: 31324452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Emerging Role of AI in Patient Education: A Comparative Analysis of LLM Accuracy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Rahimli Ocakoglu S; Coskun B
Med Princ Pract; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating Large Language Models for the National Premedical Exam in India: Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard.
Farhat F; Chaudhry BM; Nadeem M; Sohail SS; Madsen DØ
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51523. PubMed ID: 38381486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of large language models in intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons examination.
Chan J; Dong T; Angelini GD
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38445611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology.
Mazmudar RS; Sheth A; Tripathi R; Scott JF
Arch Dermatol Res; 2021 Apr; 313(3):201-204. PubMed ID: 32020323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning to Make Rare and Complex Diagnoses With Generative AI Assistance: Qualitative Study of Popular Large Language Models.
Abdullahi T; Singh R; Eickhoff C
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51391. PubMed ID: 38349725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the impact of innovative AI chatbot on post-pandemic medical education and clinical assistance: a comprehensive analysis.
Xie Y; Seth I; Hunter-Smith DJ; Rozen WM; Seifman MA
ANZ J Surg; 2024 Feb; 94(1-2):68-77. PubMed ID: 37602755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery.
Lucy AT; Rakestraw SL; Stringer C; Chu D; Grams J; Stahl R; Mustian MN
Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6519-6525. PubMed ID: 37277519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
