396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38474081)
1. When the Embryo Meets the Endometrium: Identifying the Features Required for Successful Embryo Implantation.
Lacconi V; Massimiani M; Carriero I; Bianco C; Ticconi C; Pavone V; Alteri A; Muzii L; Rago R; Pisaturo V; Campagnolo L
Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Feb; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 38474081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endometrial Receptivity Analysis - a tool to increase an implantation rate in assisted reproduction.
Hromadová L; Tokareva I; Veselá K; Trávník P; Veselý J
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):177-183. PubMed ID: 31324106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of hyaluronan-enriched culture medium and intrauterine infusion of human chorionic gonadotropin on clinical outcomes in blastocyst transfer cycles.
Balakier H; Kuznyetsova I; Librach CL
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2020 Apr; 66(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 32129683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis.
Enciso M; Carrascosa JP; Sarasa J; Martínez-Ortiz PA; Munné S; Horcajadas JA; Aizpurua J
Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 29315421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential proteomic analysis of endometrial fluid suggests increased inflammation and impaired glucose metabolism in non-implantative IVF cycles and pinpoints PYGB as a putative implantation marker.
Azkargorta M; Escobes I; Iloro I; Osinalde N; Corral B; Ibañez-Perez J; Exposito A; Prieto B; Elortza F; Matorras R
Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1898-1906. PubMed ID: 30169642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying biomarkers for predicting successful embryo implantation: applying single to multi-OMICs to improve reproductive outcomes.
Hernández-Vargas P; Muñoz M; Domínguez F
Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Feb; 26(2):264-301. PubMed ID: 32096829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Podocalyxin inhibits human embryo implantation in vitro and luminal podocalyxin in putative receptive endometrium is associated with implantation failure in fertility treatment.
Heng S; Samarajeewa N; Aberkane A; Essahib W; Van de Velde H; Scelwyn M; Hull ML; Vollenhoven B; Rombauts LJ; Nie G
Fertil Steril; 2021 Nov; 116(5):1391-1401. PubMed ID: 34272065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Craciunas L; Gallos I; Chu J; Bourne T; Quenby S; Brosens JJ; Coomarasamy A
Hum Reprod Update; 2019 Mar; 25(2):202-223. PubMed ID: 30624659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is the contribution of embryo-endometrial asynchrony to implantation failure?
Teh WT; McBain J; Rogers P
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Nov; 33(11):1419-1430. PubMed ID: 27480540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer?
Bassil R; Casper R; Samara N; Hsieh TB; Barzilay E; Orvieto R; Haas J
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jul; 35(7):1301-1305. PubMed ID: 29737471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by endometrial receptivity (ER) assessment - a possibility to increase effectiveness of IVF procedures. Review of available methods.
Urban A; Warzecha D; Laudanski P; Pietrzak B; Wielgos M
Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(12):1004-1010. PubMed ID: 37162136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What a difference two days make: "personalized" embryo transfer (pET) paradigm: a case report and pilot study.
Ruiz-Alonso M; Galindo N; Pellicer A; Simón C
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1244-7. PubMed ID: 24737781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant for subfertile women in assisted reproduction.
Siristatidis CS; Sertedaki E; Karageorgiou V; Vaidakis D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013063. PubMed ID: 32797689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The proliferative phase endometrium in IVF/ICSI: an in-cycle molecular analysis predictive of the outcome following fresh embryo transfer.
Mackens S; Santos-Ribeiro S; Racca A; Daneels D; Koch A; Essahib W; Verpoest W; Bourgain C; Van Riet I; Tournaye H; Brosens JJ; Lee YH; Blockeel C; Van de Velde H
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):130-144. PubMed ID: 31916571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing endometrial receptivity array to histologic dating of the endometrium in women with a history of implantation failure.
Cohen AM; Ye XY; Colgan TJ; Greenblatt EM; Chan C
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2020 Dec; 66(6):347-354. PubMed ID: 32998580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of embryo quality and endometrial thickness on implantation in natural cycle IVF.
Tomic V; Kasum M; Vucic K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1325-1330. PubMed ID: 32211954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: importance of endometrial receptivity.
Paulson RJ; Sauer MV; Lobo RA
Fertil Steril; 1990 May; 53(5):870-4. PubMed ID: 2110078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A critical appraisal of studies on endometrial thickness and embryo transfer outcome.
Mathyk B; Schwartz A; DeCherney A; Ata B
Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Oct; 47(4):103259. PubMed ID: 37516058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of endometrial echo pattern transformation after hCG trigger in predicting IVF pregnancy outcome: a prospective cohort study.
Hou Z; Zhang Q; Zhao J; Xu A; He A; Huang X; Xie S; Fu J; Xiao L; Li Y
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2019 Sep; 17(1):74. PubMed ID: 31488148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.
JOINT SOGC-CFAS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Aug; 102(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18773532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
