These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38474886)

  • 1. Efficient Model-Based Anthropometry under Clothing Using Low-Cost Depth Sensors.
    Park BD; Jung H; Ebert SM; Corner BD; Reed MP
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Feb; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 38474886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of military combat clothing size using decision trees and 3D body scan data.
    Kolose S; Stewart T; Hume P; Tomkinson GR
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103435. PubMed ID: 33932688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Child body shape measurement using depth cameras and a statistical body shape model.
    Park BK; Lumeng JC; Lumeng CN; Ebert SM; Reed MP
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 25323820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Template Deformation-Based 3-D Reconstruction of Full Human Body Scans From Low-Cost Depth Cameras.
    Zhenbao Liu ; Jinxin Huang ; Shuhui Bu ; Junwei Han ; Xiaojun Tang ; Xuelong Li
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2017 Mar; 47(3):695-708. PubMed ID: 26929083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precision of the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements.
    Robinette KM; Daanen HAM
    Appl Ergon; 2006 May; 37(3):259-265. PubMed ID: 16202970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scan posture definition and hip girth measurement: the impact on clothing design and body scanning.
    Gill S; Parker CJ
    Ergonomics; 2017 Aug; 60(8):1123-1136. PubMed ID: 27764997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of units of measurement error in anthropometric comparisons.
    Lucas T; Henneberg M
    Anthropol Anz; 2017 Sep; 74(3):183-192. PubMed ID: 28765869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity and repeatability of a depth camera-based surface imaging system for thigh volume measurement.
    Bullas AM; Choppin S; Heller B; Wheat J
    J Sports Sci; 2016 Oct; 34(20):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 26928458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the multivariate accommodation performance of the grid method.
    Jung K; Kwon O; You H
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Dec; 42(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 20688318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A collaborative, mixed-methods evaluation of a low-cost, handheld 3D imaging system for child anthropometry.
    Conkle J; Keirsey K; Hughes A; Breiman J; Ramakrishnan U; Suchdev PS; Martorell R
    Matern Child Nutr; 2019 Apr; 15(2):e12686. PubMed ID: 30194911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cluster size prediction for military clothing using 3D body scan data.
    Kolose S; Stewart T; Hume P; Tomkinson GR
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103487. PubMed ID: 34111769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of a 2D image-based anthropometric measurement and clothing sizing system.
    Meunier P; Yin S
    Appl Ergon; 2000 Oct; 31(5):445-51. PubMed ID: 11059458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Handheld 3D scanning as a minimally invasive measuring technique for neonatal anthropometry.
    Andrews ET; Ashton JJ; Pearson F; Beattie RM; Johnson MJ
    Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2019 Oct; 33():279-282. PubMed ID: 31451267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Machine learning prediction of combat basic training injury from 3D body shape images.
    Morse S; Talty K; Kuiper P; Scioletti M; Heymsfield SB; Atkinson RL; Thomas DM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0235017. PubMed ID: 32603356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated anthropometric phenotyping with novel Kinect-based three-dimensional imaging method: comparison with a reference laser imaging system.
    Soileau L; Bautista D; Johnson C; Gao C; Zhang K; Li X; Heymsfield SB; Thomas D; Zheng J
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2016 Apr; 70(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 26373966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acceptability, Precision and Accuracy of 3D Photonic Scanning for Measurement of Body Shape in a Multi-Ethnic Sample of Children Aged 5-11 Years: The SLIC Study.
    Wells JC; Stocks J; Bonner R; Raywood E; Legg S; Lee S; Treleaven P; Lum S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124193. PubMed ID: 25919034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of clinical measures of total and regional body composition from a commercial 3-dimensional optical body scanner.
    Bennett JP; Liu YE; Quon BK; Kelly NN; Wong MC; Kennedy SF; Chow DC; Garber AK; Weiss EJ; Heymsfield SB; Shepherd JA
    Clin Nutr; 2022 Jan; 41(1):211-218. PubMed ID: 34915272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bra band size measurements derived from three-dimensional scans are not accurate in women with large, ptotic breasts.
    McGhee DE; Ramsay LG; Coltman CE; Gho SA; Steele JR
    Ergonomics; 2018 Mar; 61(3):464-472. PubMed ID: 28673203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Formulae for calculating body surface area in modern U.S. Army Soldiers.
    Looney DP; Sanford DP; Li P; Santee WR; Doughty EM; Potter AW
    J Therm Biol; 2020 Aug; 92():102650. PubMed ID: 32888557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representation of a human head with bi-cubic B-splines technique based on the laser scanning technique in 3D surface anthropometry.
    Zhang B; Molenbroek JF
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Sep; 35(5):459-65. PubMed ID: 15246884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.