These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38474897)

  • 1. Comparison of Sensor-Based and Audible Detection of Milking Liner Slips during Machine Milking of Dairy Cows.
    Wieland M; Spellman ME; Case KL; Geary CM; Sipka A
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Feb; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 38474897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective cohort study of the relationship between milking machine liner slip, milking performance, and cow characteristics.
    Wieland M; Sipka A
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Mar; 106(3):2044-2053. PubMed ID: 36586800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Type of teat cup liner and cluster ventilation affect vacuum conditions in the liner and milking performance in dairy cows.
    Holst GE; Adrion F; Umstätter C; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4775-4786. PubMed ID: 33612232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for assessing teatcup liner performance during the peak milk flow period.
    Penry JF; Upton J; Leonardi S; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jan; 101(1):649-660. PubMed ID: 29102142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing liner performance using on-farm milk meters.
    Penry JF; Leonardi S; Upton J; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Aug; 99(8):6609-6618. PubMed ID: 27236765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review: Milking machine settings, teat condition and milking efficiency in dairy cows.
    Odorčić M; Rasmussen MD; Paulrud CO; Bruckmaier RM
    Animal; 2019 Jul; 13(S1):s94-s99. PubMed ID: 31280747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced liner-open phase and vacuum instead of prestimulation increase parlor efficiency in dairy cows.
    Tuor M; Jenni B; Wellnitz O; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):1533-1541. PubMed ID: 34955277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vacuum levels and milk-flow-dependent vacuum drops affect machine milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Besier J; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):3096-3102. PubMed ID: 26830741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different vacuum levels, vacuum reduction during low milk flow, and different cluster detachment levels affect milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Stauffer C; Feierabend M; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9250-9260. PubMed ID: 32747105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors for delayed milk ejection in Holstein dairy cows milked 3 times per day.
    Wieland M; Watters RD; Virkler PD; Sipka AS
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Aug; 105(8):6936-6946. PubMed ID: 35773032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of liner slips, milking time, and milk yield.
    O'Callaghan EJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Mar; 79(3):390-5. PubMed ID: 8708099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of flow-controlled vacuum on milking performance and teat condition in a rotary milking parlor.
    Reinemann DJ; van den Borne BHP; Hogeveen H; Wiedemann M; Paulrud CO
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):6820-6831. PubMed ID: 33773794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions of vacuum, b-phase duration, and liner compression on milk flow rates in dairy cows.
    Bade RD; Reinemann DJ; Zucali M; Ruegg PL; Thompson PD
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Mar; 92(3):913-21. PubMed ID: 19233784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bimodal milk flow and overmilking in dairy cattle: risk factors and consequences.
    Fernandes S; Pereira G; Bexiga R
    Animal; 2023 Mar; 17(3):100716. PubMed ID: 36791490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 2 types of milk flow meters for detecting bimodality in dairy cows.
    Wieland M; Sipka A
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Feb; 106(2):1078-1088. PubMed ID: 36494231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without a latency period, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows.
    Singh A; Geary CM; Case KL; Juran I; Olszanski L; Sytch N; Womack SJ; Dahl M; Spellman ME; Wieland M
    J Dairy Sci; 2024 Mar; 107(3):1719-1733. PubMed ID: 37769948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A longitudinal prospective cohort study investigating the association of premilking stimulation and teat-end shape on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition in dairy cows.
    Wieland M; Melvin JM; Nydam DV; Virkler PD
    BMC Vet Res; 2019 Feb; 15(1):58. PubMed ID: 30755196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship among udder and teat morphology and milking characteristics.
    Rogers GW; Spencer SB
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Dec; 74(12):4189-94. PubMed ID: 1787190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dam-calf contact rearing in Switzerland: Aspects of management and milking.
    Rell J; Nanchen C; Savary P; Buchli C; Rufener C
    J Dairy Sci; 2024 Sep; 107(9):7185-7200. PubMed ID: 38762107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without manual forestripping, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows milked 3 times daily.
    Wieland M; Virkler PD; Weld A; Melvin JM; Wettstein MR; Oswald MF; Geary CM; Watters RD; Lynch R; Nydam DV
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9548-9560. PubMed ID: 32828498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.