165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38476638)
21. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Monte Carlo evaluation of hypothetical long axial field-of-view PET scanner using GE Discovery MI PET front-end architecture.
Tiwari A; Merrick M; Graves SA; Sunderland J
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):1139-1152. PubMed ID: 34954831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.
Doot RK; Scheuermann JS; Christian PE; Karp JS; Kinahan PE
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6035-46. PubMed ID: 21158315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Harmonizing standardized uptake value recovery between two PET/CT systems from different manufacturers when using resolution modelling and time-of-flight.
Armstrong IS; Thomson KE; Rowley LM; McGowan DR
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jul; 38(7):650-655. PubMed ID: 28445243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Standardized Uptake Values of
Tlostanova MS; Chipiga LA
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2021; 13(3):15-23. PubMed ID: 34603751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Harmonization of Standardized Uptake Value among Different Generation PET/ CT Cameras Based on a Phantom Experiment -Utility of SUV(peak)].
Akamatsu G; Nishida H; Fujino A; Ohnishi A; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Sep; 71(9):735-45. PubMed ID: 26400557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimisation of CT protocols in PET-CT across different scanner models using different automatic exposure control methods and iterative reconstruction algorithms.
Gould SM; Mackewn J; Chicklore S; Cook GJR; Mallia A; Pike L
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Jul; 8(1):58. PubMed ID: 34331602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery and time of flight modeling for
Matheoud R; Lecchi M; Lizio D; Scabbio C; Marcassa C; Leva L; Del Sole A; Rodella C; Indovina L; Bracco C; Brambilla M; Zoccarato O
J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 24(3):1036-1045. PubMed ID: 26758376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.
Beichel RR; Smith BJ; Bauer C; Ulrich EJ; Ahmadvand P; Budzevich MM; Gillies RJ; Goldgof D; Grkovski M; Hamarneh G; Huang Q; Kinahan PE; Laymon CM; Mountz JM; Muzi JP; Muzi M; Nehmeh S; Oborski MJ; Tan Y; Zhao B; Sunderland JJ; Buatti JM
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):479-496. PubMed ID: 28205306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of partial volume effect correction on cerebral β-amyloid imaging in APP-Swe mice using [(18)F]-florbetaben PET.
Brendel M; Delker A; Rötzer C; Böning G; Carlsen J; Cyran C; Mille E; Gildehaus FJ; Cumming P; Baumann K; Steiner H; Haass C; Herms J; Bartenstein P; Rominger A
Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():843-53. PubMed ID: 24055703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Edge Artifacts in Point Spread Function-based PET Reconstruction in Relation to Object Size and Reconstruction Parameters.
Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Umezu Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2017; 5(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 28660224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spatial resolution and image qualities of Zr-89 on Siemens Biograph TruePoint PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim JY; Kim BI; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2015 Feb; 30(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25549151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.
Jakoby BW; Bercier Y; Conti M; Casey ME; Bendriem B; Townsend DW
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2375-89. PubMed ID: 21427485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Benefit of Improved Performance with State-of-the Art Digital PET/CT for Lesion Detection in Oncology.
Surti S; Viswanath V; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Conti M; Casey ME; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2020 Nov; 61(11):1684-1690. PubMed ID: 32198313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Usefulness of semi-automatic harmonization strategy of standardized uptake values for multicenter PET studies.
Daisaki H; Kitajima K; Nakajo M; Watabe T; Ito K; Sakamoto F; Nakahara T; Ishibashi M; Toriihara A
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8517. PubMed ID: 33875730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improved PET quantification and harmonization by adaptive denoising.
Namías M; Jeraj R
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015023. PubMed ID: 33438611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. System resolution versus image uncertainty for positron emission tomography scanners.
Studen A; Clinthorne N
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2022 May; 9(3):033501. PubMed ID: 35578602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of advanced iterative reconstruction methods for SPECT/CT.
Knoll P; Kotalova D; Köchle G; Kuzelka I; Minear G; Mirzaei S; Sámal M; Zadrazil L; Bergmann H
Z Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 22(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 21723716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Physical performance of a long axial field-of-view PET scanner prototype with sparse rings configuration: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Zein SA; Karakatsanis NA; Issa M; Haj-Ali AA; Nehmeh SA
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1949-1957. PubMed ID: 31985827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
