These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38477608)

  • 1. Invited Perspective: Why Systematic Reviews, Scoping Reviews, and Evidence-to-Decision Frameworks Are Critical for Transparent, Consistent, Equitable, and Science-Based Decision-Making in Environmental Health.
    Chartres N; Joglekar R
    Environ Health Perspect; 2024 Mar; 132(3):31304. PubMed ID: 38477608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-to-decision frameworks: a review and analysis to inform decision-making for environmental health interventions.
    Norris SL; Aung MT; Chartres N; Woodruff TJ
    Environ Health; 2021 Dec; 20(1):124. PubMed ID: 34876125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
    Munn Z; Peters MDJ; Stern C; Tufanaru C; McArthur A; Aromataris E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 30453902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advancing systematic-review methodology in exposure science for environmental health decision making.
    Cohen Hubal EA; Frank JJ; Nachman R; Angrish M; Deziel NC; Fry M; Tornero-Velez R; Kraft A; Lavoie E
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):906-916. PubMed ID: 32467626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic reviews: Separating fact from fiction.
    Haddaway NR; Bilotta GS
    Environ Int; 2016; 92-93():578-84. PubMed ID: 26371438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians.
    Murthy L; Shepperd S; Clarke MJ; Garner SE; Lavis JN; Perrier L; Roberts NW; Straus SE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD009401. PubMed ID: 22972142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reviews in environmental health: How systematic are they?
    Sutton P; Chartres N; Rayasam SDG; Daniels N; Lam J; Maghrbi E; Woodruff TJ
    Environ Int; 2021 Jul; 152():106473. PubMed ID: 33798823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protocol of a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about COVID-19 vaccines and associated adverse events from vaccination.
    Pranić SM; Vasanthan LT; Thompson JY; Mishra V; Kumar P; Ananda RA; Malih N; Chan KK
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285442. PubMed ID: 37163502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Approaches for assessing decision-making capacity in older adults: a scoping review protocol.
    Usher R; Stapleton T
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Apr; 18(4):832-840. PubMed ID: 32813344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How consumers and policymakers can use systematic reviews for decision making.
    Bero LA; Jadad AR
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Jul; 127(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 9214251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review.
    Tricco AC; Cardoso R; Thomas SM; Motiwala S; Sullivan S; Kealey MR; Hemmelgarn B; Ouimet M; Hillmer MP; Perrier L; Shepperd S; Straus SE
    Implement Sci; 2016 Jan; 11():4. PubMed ID: 26753923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the utility of evidence synthesis for decision makers in the face of insufficient evidence.
    Murad MH; Chang SM; Fiordalisi CV; Lin JS; Wilt TJ; Tsou AY; Leas B; Siddique S; Zullo AR; Balk EM; Rutter CM; Robinson K; Coleman C; Costa O; Helfand M; Stoeger E; Viswanathan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 135():170-175. PubMed ID: 33753229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying optimal frameworks to implement or evaluate digital health interventions: a scoping review protocol.
    Soobiah C; Cooper M; Kishimoto V; Bhatia RS; Scott T; Maloney S; Larsen D; Wijeysundera HC; Zelmer J; Gray CS; Desveaux L
    BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e037643. PubMed ID: 32792444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision aids for female BRCA mutation carriers: a scoping review protocol.
    McGarrigle SA; Prizeman G; Spillane C; Byrne N; Drury A; Mockler D; Connolly EM; Brady AM; Hanhauser YP
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jul; 11(7):e045075. PubMed ID: 34253662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review.
    Haby MM; Chapman E; Clark R; Barreto J; Reveiz L; Lavis JN
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Nov; 14(1):83. PubMed ID: 27884208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.
    Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Five shared decision-making tools in 5 months: use of rapid reviews to develop decision boxes for seniors living with dementia and their caregivers.
    Lawani MA; Valéra B; Fortier-Brochu É; Légaré F; Carmichael PH; Côté L; Voyer P; Kröger E; Witteman H; Rodriguez C; Giguere AM
    Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):56. PubMed ID: 28298241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. User survey finds rapid evidence reviews increased uptake of evidence by Veterans Health Administration leadership to inform fast-paced health-system decision-making.
    Peterson K; Floyd N; Ferguson L; Christensen V; Helfand M
    Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 5(1):132. PubMed ID: 27491354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.