These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3847792)

  • 21. Evidence to the Review Body.
    Clay T
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Dec; (377):suppl 1. PubMed ID: 6569339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. True worth.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1985 Dec; (427):3. PubMed ID: 3853100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Money talks.
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Feb; 3(21):13. PubMed ID: 2494550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Royal College of Nursing. Come of age.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1987 Apr; (492):4. PubMed ID: 3646486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. RCN in a spin over nurses' pay.
    Chamberlain P
    Nurs Times; 2001 May 3-9; 97(18):18. PubMed ID: 11957873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Royal College of Nursing. Watch and wait.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1987 Mar; (488):4. PubMed ID: 3645323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. All at sea on pay?
    Webb J
    Nurs Times; 1987 Jan 14-20; 83(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 3643548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Royal College of Nursing. Right message.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1986 Aug; (460):4. PubMed ID: 3637670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Royal College of Nursing: never the same; fees system.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Aug; (358):4. PubMed ID: 6565992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gearing up for the next pay review.
    Chudley P
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Aug; (358):1, 11. PubMed ID: 6565990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Self restraint brings an advantage.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 May; (347):4. PubMed ID: 6563417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recruitment and retention: vital evidence in the pay debate.
    Lampada; 1988 Jan; (13):4. PubMed ID: 3357360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Members vote for peace and pay review promise.
    Chudley P
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1982 Dec; (276):1, 8. PubMed ID: 6984527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The backlash.
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 Feb 22-8; 91(8):18. PubMed ID: 7885899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Staff side recommends radical changes for teachers.
    Ellis S
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Nov; (375):1, 12. PubMed ID: 6568446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pay: reviewing the situation.
    Hand D
    Nurs Stand; 1991 Nov 27-Dec 3; 6(10):18-9. PubMed ID: 1764394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Royal College of Nursing. Recognition.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1986 May; (449):4. PubMed ID: 3635706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A national perspective.
    Hancock C
    Nurs Stand; 1996 Sep; 10(50):20. PubMed ID: 8868902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pay campaign. Working to rules.
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 Apr 12-18; 91(15):18. PubMed ID: 7731836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pay. In and out of pocket.
    Leifer D; Scott G
    Nurs Stand; 1995 May 31-Jun 6; 9(36):21. PubMed ID: 7612439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.