These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38478053)

  • 1. Memory-driven capture during focused visual attention.
    Yang Y; Su L; Pan Y
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 38478053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.
    Han SW
    Cogn Process; 2018 Feb; 19(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28871460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory contents revive the neglected, but suppress the inhibited.
    Han SW
    Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():116-21. PubMed ID: 26355831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.
    Wu Y; Pan Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):760-770. PubMed ID: 35359229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.
    Kuo CY; Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24730739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The modulation of perceptual selection by working memory is dependent on the focus of spatial attention.
    Pan Y; Soto D
    Vision Res; 2010 Jul; 50(15):1437-44. PubMed ID: 19883679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The color-word Stroop effect driven by working memory maintenance.
    Pan Y; Han Y; Zuo W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2722-2731. PubMed ID: 31214969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of presentation duration on filtering of irrelevant stimuli in visual working memory.
    Liu Q; Yin X; Guo L; Ye C
    BMC Psychol; 2024 Sep; 12(1):469. PubMed ID: 39223690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pang C; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Nan W; Fu S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1148-1162. PubMed ID: 38491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by the contents of working memory: An EEG study.
    Hinault T; Blacker KJ; Gormley M; Anderson BA; Courtney SM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 19(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 30460482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Behind the scenes: how visual memory load biases selective attention during processing of visual streams.
    Klaver P; Talsma D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1133-46. PubMed ID: 24015992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
    Inukai T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.