125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38479873)
1. [Reducing the Time Before the Console in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy].
Hoshino K; Kurita T; Tohyama A; Kinjo Y; Nishimura K; Harada H; Ueda T; Kagami S; Yoshino K; Matsuura Y
J UOEH; 2024; 46(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 38479873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning Curve Analysis of Different Stages of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
Tang FH; Tsai EM
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():1827913. PubMed ID: 28373977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-site robotic total hysterectomy: standardization of technique and surgical outcomes.
Sendag F; Akdemir A; Zeybek B; Ozdemir A; Gunusen I; Oztekin MK
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):689-94. PubMed ID: 24530696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of life in patients who undergo conventional or robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Rodrigues RC; Rodrigues MRK; Freitas NO; Rudge MVC; Lima SAM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(23):e15974. PubMed ID: 31169730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.
Gungor M; Kahraman K; Dursun P; Ozbasli E; Genim C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28429119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative Pain Scores and Narcotic Use in Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Staging.
Turner TB; Habib AS; Broadwater G; Valea FA; Fleming ND; Ehrisman JA; Di Santo N; Havrilesky LJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1004-10. PubMed ID: 25967934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of robotic surgery in treating fibroids and benign uterine mass.
Kim S; Luu TH; Llarena N; Falcone T
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 45():48-59. PubMed ID: 28551090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.
Lawrie TA; Liu H; Lu D; Dowswell T; Song H; Wang L; Shi G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 4(4):CD011422. PubMed ID: 30985921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of Reduced-Port Robotic Surgery for Myomectomy with the da Vinci Surgical System.
Kim JJ; Choi C; Nam SH; Kim WY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):926-931. PubMed ID: 28487176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of surgical outcomes and learning curve of surgical parameters for robotic hysterectomy: a comparison between multiport versus single-site.
Gardella B; Dominoni M; Gritti A; Musacchi V; Stracquadaini M; Bogliolo S; Scudeller L; Spinillo A
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Aug; 31(6):954-961. PubMed ID: 35225752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
