121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38479883)
1. [Segmentation of Mass in Mammogram Using Gaze Search Patterns].
Okumura E; Kato H; Honmoto T; Suzuki N; Okumura E; Higashigawa T; Kitamura S; Ando J; Ishida T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2024 May; 80(5):487-498. PubMed ID: 38479883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TrEnD: A transformer-based encoder-decoder model with adaptive patch embedding for mass segmentation in mammograms.
Liu D; Wu B; Li C; Sun Z; Zhang N
Med Phys; 2023 May; 50(5):2884-2899. PubMed ID: 36609788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep Learning Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Lesion in Digital Mammogram.
Al-Antari MA; Al-Masni MA; Kim TS
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2020; 1213():59-72. PubMed ID: 32030663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early detection and classification of abnormality in prior mammograms using image-to-image translation and YOLO techniques.
Baccouche A; Garcia-Zapirain B; Zheng Y; Elmaghraby AS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 221():106884. PubMed ID: 35594582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Convolutional neural network for automated mass segmentation in mammography.
Abdelhafiz D; Bi J; Ammar R; Yang C; Nabavi S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 21(Suppl 1):192. PubMed ID: 33297952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated multimodal segmentation of an abnormal breast mass in mammogram.
Kirubha AS; Rachel M; Anburajan M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jun; 230(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 27045116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A hierarchical pipeline for breast boundary segmentation and calcification detection in mammograms.
Shi P; Zhong J; Rampun A; Wang H
Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():178-188. PubMed ID: 29597143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms.
Sanjay-Gopal S; Chan HP; Wilson T; Helvie M; Petrick N; Sahiner B
Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 10619252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An observer study comparing spot imaging regions selected by radiologists and a computer for an automated stereo spot mammography technique.
Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Lydick JT; Gandra CR; Chen NG; Helvie MA; Bailey JE; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Sahiner B; Petrick NA
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1558-67. PubMed ID: 15259660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a computer-aided detection (CAD)-enhanced 2D synthetic mammogram: comparison with standard synthetic 2D mammograms and conventional 2D digital mammography.
James JJ; Giannotti E; Chen Y
Clin Radiol; 2018 Oct; 73(10):886-892. PubMed ID: 29970247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammogram segmentation using maximal cell strength updation in cellular automata.
Anitha J; Peter JD
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Aug; 53(8):737-49. PubMed ID: 25841356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A fully integrated computer-aided diagnosis system for digital X-ray mammograms via deep learning detection, segmentation, and classification.
Al-Antari MA; Al-Masni MA; Choi MT; Han SM; Kim TS
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Sep; 117():44-54. PubMed ID: 30032964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A robust method for segmenting pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms.
Yin K; Yan S; Song C; Zheng B
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 30288698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Boetes C; Flobbe K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 19418215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Globally supported radial basis function based collocation method for evolution of level set in mass segmentation using mammograms.
Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Aug; 87():22-37. PubMed ID: 28549292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deep learning methods for lesion detection on mammography images: a comparative analysis.
Ribeiro RF; Gomes-Fonseca J; Torres HR; Oliveira B; Vilhena E; Morais P; Vilaca JL
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():3526-3529. PubMed ID: 36086472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammogram mass segmentation and classification based on cross-view VAE and spatial hidden factor disentanglement.
Ma Y; Peng Y
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 47(1):223-238. PubMed ID: 38150059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel breast cancer detection architecture based on a CNN-CBR system for mammogram classification.
Bouzar-Benlabiod L; Harrar K; Yamoun L; Khodja MY; Akhloufi MA
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Sep; 163():107133. PubMed ID: 37327756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
