These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38481283)

  • 1. Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study.
    Chill HH; Hadizadeh A; Paya-Ten C; Leffelman A; Chang C; Moss NP; Goldberg RP
    BMC Womens Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):173. PubMed ID: 38481283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 30-Day unanticipated healthcare encounters after prolapse surgery: impact of same day discharge.
    Romanova AL; Carter-Brooks C; Ruppert KM; Zyczynski HM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):482.e1-482.e8. PubMed ID: 31733206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Racial and ethnic differences in reconstructive surgery for apical vaginal prolapse.
    Boyd BAJ; Winkelman WD; Mishra K; Vittinghoff E; Jacoby VL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):405.e1-405.e7. PubMed ID: 33984303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive surgery in urogynecology: a comparison of standard laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, percutaneous surgical system, and robotic sacral colpopexy.
    Panico G; Campagna G; Vacca L; Caramazza D; Iannone V; Rossitto C; Rumolo V; Scambia G; Ercoli A
    Minerva Med; 2021 Aug; 112(4):483-491. PubMed ID: 32272829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoperative adverse events and re-treatment among patients who have undergone laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in Japan.
    Shigemi D; Okada A; Yasunaga H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):114-119. PubMed ID: 36200666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of BMI on clinical outcomes following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Patnam R; Husk K; Sripad A; Barletta K; Dieter A; Geller EJ
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 32300933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse.
    Biler A; Ertas IE; Tosun G; Hortu I; Turkay U; Gultekin OE; Igci G
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 30044591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study.
    Illiano E; Ditonno P; Giannitsas K; De Rienzo G; Bini V; Costantini E
    Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol.
    Coolen AWM; van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden AMJ; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Mol BWJ; Roovers JP; Bongers MY
    BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy.
    Oh S; Yi J; Song AY; Jee J; Bae N; Shin JH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 38900162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Healthcare Resource Utilization Following Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: Impact of Concomitant Rectopexy.
    Lua-Mailland LL; Stanley EE; Yao M; Paraiso MFR; Wallace SL; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 May; 35(5):1001-1010. PubMed ID: 38416154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
    Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementation of a urogynecology-specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.
    Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Ruppert KM; Romanova AL; Zyczynski HM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):495.e1-495.e10. PubMed ID: 29913175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
    Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
    Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mini-laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical and posterior female pelvic organ prolapse.
    Blaganje M; Lutfallah F; Deval B
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jul; 27(7):1117-9. PubMed ID: 26886552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus.
    Bradley MS; Askew AL; Vaughan MH; Kawasaki A; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):514.e1-514.e8. PubMed ID: 29425837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A robotic approach to management of failed sacrocolpopexy and sacrocolpopexy complications: a case series.
    Goodwin AI; Torres J; O'Shaughnessy DL; Finamore PS
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3231-3236. PubMed ID: 35267061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.