27 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38482806)
1. Verbal and pictorial single-item scales are as good as their 10-item counterparts for measuring perceived usability.
Gräve E; Bell R; Buchner A
Ergonomics; 2024 Jun; ():1-15. PubMed ID: 38940285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring User Experience With 3, 5, 7, or 11 Points : Does It Matter?
Lewis JR
Hum Factors; 2021 Sep; 63(6):999-1011. PubMed ID: 31603695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of system usability scale as a usability metric to evaluate voice user interfaces.
Deshmukh AM; Chalmeta R
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2024; 10():e1918. PubMed ID: 38435614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sociodemographic Characteristics Associated With an eHealth System Designed to Reduce Depressive Symptoms Among Patients With Breast or Prostate Cancer: Prospective Study.
Petros NG; Hadlaczky G; Carletto S; Martinez SG; Ostacoli L; Ottaviano M; Meyer B; Scilingo EP; Carli V
JMIR Form Res; 2022 Jun; 6(6):e33734. PubMed ID: 35675116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Poor usability of computer-assisted navigation for hip fracture surgery.
Hestehave RA; Gundtoft PH; Nielsen CL; Brink O; Rölfing JD
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jan; 144(1):251-257. PubMed ID: 37878075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is Less Sometimes More? An Experimental Comparison of Four Measures of Perceived Usability.
Gräve E; Buchner A
Hum Factors; 2024 Mar; ():187208241237862. PubMed ID: 38482806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA; Routhier F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):119-131. PubMed ID: 30663444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health.
Hajesmaeel-Gohari S; Khordastan F; Fatehi F; Samzadeh H; Bahaadinbeigy K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Jan; 22(1):22. PubMed ID: 35081953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.
Muro-Culebras A; Escriche-Escuder A; Martin-Martin J; Roldán-Jiménez C; De-Torres I; Ruiz-Muñoz M; Gonzalez-Sanchez M; Mayoral-Cleries F; Biró A; Tang W; Nikolova B; Salvatore A; Cuesta-Vargas AI
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Dec; 9(12):e15433. PubMed ID: 34855618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older.
Arnhold M; Quade M; Kirch W
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Apr; 16(4):e104. PubMed ID: 24718852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
