These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38483319)

  • 21. Non-verbal IQ is correlated with visual field advantages for short duration coherent motion detection in deaf signers with varied ASL exposure and etiologies of deafness.
    Samar VJ; Parasnis I
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Dec; 65(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 17574715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preexisting semantic representation improves working memory performance in the visuospatial domain.
    Rudner M; Orfanidou E; Cardin V; Capek CM; Woll B; Rönnberg J
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 26800983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural systems underlying British Sign Language and audio-visual English processing in native users.
    MacSweeney M; Woll B; Campbell R; McGuire PK; David AS; Williams SC; Suckling J; Calvert GA; Brammer MJ
    Brain; 2002 Jul; 125(Pt 7):1583-93. PubMed ID: 12077007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners' gestures without speech.
    Schembri A; Jones C; Burnham D
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(3):272-90. PubMed ID: 15858072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sign language experience redistributes attentional resources to the inferior visual field.
    Stoll C; Dye MWG
    Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103957. PubMed ID: 31255921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Positive Relationship Between Sign Language Comprehension and Mental Rotation Abilities.
    Kubicek E; Quandt LC
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2021 Jan; 26(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32978623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neuroanatomical differences in visual, motor, and language cortices between congenitally deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing non-signers.
    Allen JS; Emmorey K; Bruss J; Damasio H
    Front Neuroanat; 2013; 7():26. PubMed ID: 23935567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers.
    Emmorey K; Kosslyn SM; Bellugi U
    Cognition; 1993 Feb; 46(2):139-81. PubMed ID: 8432094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensorimotor system engagement during ASL sign perception: An EEG study in deaf signers and hearing non-signers.
    Kubicek E; Quandt LC
    Cortex; 2019 Oct; 119():457-469. PubMed ID: 31505437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neuroanatomical profiles of deafness in the context of native language experience.
    Olulade OA; Koo DS; LaSasso CJ; Eden GF
    J Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 34(16):5613-20. PubMed ID: 24741051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of language deprivation in early childhood on L2 processing: An ERP comparison of deaf native signers and deaf signers with a delayed language acquisition.
    Skotara N; Salden U; Kügow M; Hänel-Faulhaber B; Röder B
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 May; 13():44. PubMed ID: 22554360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CNS activation and regional connectivity during pantomime observation: no engagement of the mirror neuron system for deaf signers.
    Emmorey K; Xu J; Gannon P; Goldin-Meadow S; Braun A
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):994-1005. PubMed ID: 19679192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of age on the temporal organization of working memory in deaf signers.
    Rudner M; Davidsson L; Ronnberg J
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 May; 17(3):360-83. PubMed ID: 19921581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of Gesture and Linguistic Experience on Sign Perception.
    Gimeno-Martínez M; Costa A; Baus C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2020 Jan; 25(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 31504619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual field plasticity in hearing users of sign language.
    Stoll C; Palluel-Germain R; Gueriot FX; Chiquet C; Pascalis O; Aptel F
    Vision Res; 2018 Dec; 153():105-110. PubMed ID: 30165056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sensitivity to visual prosodic cues in signers and nonsigners.
    Brentari D; González C; Seidl A; Wilbur R
    Lang Speech; 2011 Mar; 54(Pt 1):49-72. PubMed ID: 21524012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Face Recognition is Shaped by the Use of Sign Language.
    Stoll C; Palluel-Germain R; Caldara R; Lao J; Dye MWG; Aptel F; Pascalis O
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2018 Jan; 23(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 28977622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measuring Receptive ASL Skills in Novice Signers and Nonsigners.
    Hall ML; Reidies JA
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2021 Sep; 26(4):501-510. PubMed ID: 34409987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal processing in deaf signers.
    Poizner H; Tallal P
    Brain Lang; 1987 Jan; 30(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 3815056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Organization of Working Memory Networks is Shaped by Early Sensory Experience.
    Cardin V; Rudner M; De Oliveira RF; Andin J; Su MT; Beese L; Woll B; Rönnberg J
    Cereb Cortex; 2018 Oct; 28(10):3540-3554. PubMed ID: 28968707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.