208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38485486)
1. Application of generative language models to orthopaedic practice.
Caterson J; Ambler O; Cereceda-Monteoliva N; Horner M; Jones A; Poacher AT
BMJ Open; 2024 Mar; 14(3):e076484. PubMed ID: 38485486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the Application of Large Language Models in Generating Dermatologic Patient Education Materials According to Reading Level: Qualitative Study.
Lambert R; Choo ZY; Gradwohl K; Schroedl L; Ruiz De Luzuriaga A
JMIR Dermatol; 2024 May; 7():e55898. PubMed ID: 38754096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy, readability, and understandability of large language models for prostate cancer information to the public.
Hershenhouse JS; Mokhtar D; Eppler MB; Rodler S; Storino Ramacciotti L; Ganjavi C; Hom B; Davis RJ; Tran J; Russo GI; Cocci A; Abreu A; Gill I; Desai M; Cacciamani GE
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38744934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a supplementary tool for providing orthopaedic information.
Kaarre J; Feldt R; Keeling LE; Dadoo S; Zsidai B; Hughes JD; Samuelsson K; Musahl V
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Nov; 31(11):5190-5198. PubMed ID: 37553552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Large language models and bariatric surgery patient education: a comparative readability analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, and online institutional resources.
Srinivasan N; Samaan JS; Rajeev ND; Kanu MU; Yeo YH; Samakar K
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2522-2532. PubMed ID: 38472531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bridging the Gap Between Urological Research and Patient Understanding: The Role of Large Language Models in Automated Generation of Layperson's Summaries.
Eppler MB; Ganjavi C; Knudsen JE; Davis RJ; Ayo-Ajibola O; Desai A; Storino Ramacciotti L; Chen A; De Castro Abreu A; Desai MM; Gill IS; Cacciamani GE
Urol Pract; 2023 Sep; 10(5):436-443. PubMed ID: 37410015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning to Make Rare and Complex Diagnoses With Generative AI Assistance: Qualitative Study of Popular Large Language Models.
Abdullahi T; Singh R; Eickhoff C
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51391. PubMed ID: 38349725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AI-Generated Information for Vascular Patients: Assessing the Standard of Procedure-Specific Information Provided by the ChatGPT AI-Language Model.
Haidar O; Jaques A; McCaughran PW; Metcalfe MJ
Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49764. PubMed ID: 38046759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating large language models on a highly-specialized topic, radiation oncology physics.
Holmes J; Liu Z; Zhang L; Ding Y; Sio TT; McGee LA; Ashman JB; Li X; Liu T; Shen J; Liu W
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1219326. PubMed ID: 37529688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Leveraging GPT-4 for food effect summarization to enhance product-specific guidance development via iterative prompting.
Shi Y; Ren P; Wang J; Han B; ValizadehAslani T; Agbavor F; Zhang Y; Hu M; Zhao L; Liang H
J Biomed Inform; 2023 Dec; 148():104533. PubMed ID: 37918623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Orthopaedic Resident Performance on Orthopaedic Assessment Examinations.
Massey PA; Montgomery C; Zhang AS
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2023 Dec; 31(23):1173-1179. PubMed ID: 37671415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of large language models in breast cancer clinical scenarios: a comparative analysis based on ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Claude2.
Deng L; Wang T; Yangzhang ; Zhai Z; Tao W; Li J; Zhao Y; Luo S; Xu J
Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):1941-1950. PubMed ID: 38668655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the Responses of Large Language Models (ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot) to Frequently Asked Questions in Breast Imaging: A Study on Readability and Accuracy.
Tepe M; Emekli E
Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e59960. PubMed ID: 38726360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in medical dialogue summarization: a study on consistency with human preferences.
Liu Y; Ju S; Wang J
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2024 Mar; 24(1):75. PubMed ID: 38486198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Patient Education Materials Generated by Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer Versus Experts: An Innovative Way to Increase Readability of Patient Education Materials.
Hung YC; Chaker SC; Sigel M; Saad M; Slater ED
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Oct; 91(4):409-412. PubMed ID: 37713147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comprehensive Survey of ChatGPT: Advancements, Applications, Prospects, and Challenges.
Nazir A; Wang Z
Meta Radiol; 2023 Sep; 1(2):. PubMed ID: 37901715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating Large Language Models for the National Premedical Exam in India: Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard.
Farhat F; Chaudhry BM; Nadeem M; Sohail SS; Madsen DØ
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51523. PubMed ID: 38381486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Rapid Development of Artificial Intelligence: GPT-4's Performance on Orthopedic Surgery Board Questions.
Hofmann HL; Guerra GA; Le JL; Wong AM; Hofmann GH; Mayfield CK; Petrigliano FA; Liu JN
Orthopedics; 2024; 47(2):e85-e89. PubMed ID: 37757748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The performance of ChatGPT on orthopaedic in-service training exams: A comparative study of the GPT-3.5 turbo and GPT-4 models in orthopaedic education.
Rizzo MG; Cai N; Constantinescu D
J Orthop; 2024 Apr; 50():70-75. PubMed ID: 38173829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of cover letters written by ChatGPT-4 or humans.
Deveci CD; Baker JJ; Sikander B; Rosenberg J
Dan Med J; 2023 Nov; 70(12):. PubMed ID: 38018708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
