These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38485965)

  • 1. Switching between different cognitive strategies induces switch costs as evidenced by switches between manual and mental object rotation.
    Weis PP; Kunde W
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6217. PubMed ID: 38485965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Balancing cognitive and environmental constraints when deciding to switch tasks: Exploring self-reported task-selection strategies in self-organised multitasking.
    Mittelstädt V; Schaffernak I; Miller J; Kiesel A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Apr; 74(4):598-609. PubMed ID: 33084523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs.
    Tarantino V; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():160-173. PubMed ID: 27238463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cue-switch effects do not rely on the same neural systems as task-switch effects.
    De Baene W; Brass M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 21874602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response-repetition costs in task switching do not index a simple response-switch bias: Evidence from manipulating the number of response alternatives.
    Koch I; Hazeltine E; Petersen G; Weissman DH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Nov; 85(8):2577-2587. PubMed ID: 37147509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 20037766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for a multicomponent hierarchical representation of dual tasks.
    Hirsch P; Roesch C; Koch I
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Feb; 49(2):350-363. PubMed ID: 32989661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The double task-switching protocol: An investigation into the effects of similarity and conflict on cognitive flexibility in the context of mental fatigue.
    Hinss MF; Brock AM; Roy RN
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0279021. PubMed ID: 36827288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are some effector systems harder to switch to? In search of cost asymmetries when switching between manual, vocal, and oculomotor tasks.
    Hoffmann MA; Koch I; Huestegge L
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1563-1577. PubMed ID: 35199283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural Dynamics of Context-sensitive Adjustments in Cognitive Flexibility.
    Siqi-Liu A; Egner T; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 34(3):480-494. PubMed ID: 35015871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: what can we learn from task span switch costs?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 21037168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Forstmann BU; Brass M; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jul; 71(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 16397813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations.
    Siqi-Liu A; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1111-1122. PubMed ID: 37326527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.
    Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):762-77. PubMed ID: 26833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The costs of crossing paths and switching tasks between audition and vision.
    Murray MM; De Santis L; Thut G; Wylie GR
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Feb; 69(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 18571299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task switching in mild cognitive impairment: switch and nonswitch costs.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe M; Sanders C
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Jan; 15(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 19128533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The subjective evaluation of task switch cues is related to voluntary task switching.
    Vermeylen L; Braem S; Notebaert W; Ruitenberg MFL
    Cognition; 2022 Jul; 224():105063. PubMed ID: 35183008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):794-9. PubMed ID: 17328375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.