These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38486721)
1. Evaluating the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical waste disposal using preference selection index with CRADIS in a fuzzy environment. Demir AT; Moslem S Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(5):e26997. PubMed ID: 38486721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation and selection of healthcare waste incinerators using extended sustainability criteria and multi-criteria analysis methods. Puška A; Stević Ž; Pamučar D Environ Dev Sustain; 2022; 24(9):11195-11225. PubMed ID: 34720689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selection of the best healthcare waste disposal techniques during and post COVID-19 pandemic era. Manupati VK; Ramkumar M; Baba V; Agarwal A J Clean Prod; 2021 Jan; 281():125175. PubMed ID: 33223625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An identification of optimal waste disposal method for dumpsite remediation using the Fermatean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method. Jeon J; Manirathinam T; Geetha S; Narayanamoorthy S; Salimi M; Ahmadian A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38386159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkey. Çelik S; Peker İ; Gök-Kısa AC; Büyüközkan G Socioecon Plann Sci; 2023 Apr; 86():101499. PubMed ID: 36540295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The application of a multi-parameter analysis in choosing the location of a new solid waste landfill in Serbia. Milosevic I; Naunovic Z Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10):1019-27. PubMed ID: 23853238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dual hesitant q-rung orthopair enhanced MARCOS methodology under uncertainty to determine a used PPE kit disposal. Kang D; Anuja A; Narayanamoorthy S; Gangemi M; Ahmadian A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(59):89625-89642. PubMed ID: 35857161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study. Afrane S; Ampah JD; Agyekum EB; Amoh PO; Yusuf AA; Fattah IMR; Agbozo E; Elgamli E; Shouran M; Mao G; Kamel S Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. Liu HC; Wu J; Li P Waste Manag; 2013 Dec; 33(12):2744-51. PubMed ID: 24011433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical Waste Disposal Method Selection Based on a Hierarchical Decision Model with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Relations. Qian W; Wang ZJ; Li KW Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Sep; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 27618082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Entropy and discrimination measures based q-rung orthopair fuzzy MULTIMOORA framework for selecting solid waste disposal method. Mishra AR; Rani P; Pamucar D; Hezam IM; Saha A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(5):12988-13011. PubMed ID: 36121629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selection of an Insurance Company in Agriculture through Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. Puška A; Lukić M; Božanić D; Nedeljković M; Hezam IM Entropy (Basel); 2023 Jun; 25(6):. PubMed ID: 37372302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hazardous Waste Disposal Enterprise Selection in China Using Hesitant Fuzzy PROMETHEE. Liang X; Miao J; Li Y; Yang X; Li Z Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 32560196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Digital Technology Strategies in COVID-19 Pandemic Under Uncertainty. Salimian S; Mousavi SM Arab J Sci Eng; 2023; 48(5):7005-7017. PubMed ID: 36090763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Onüt S; Soner S Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of sustainable waste management alternatives using the extensions of the base criterion method and combined compromise solution based on the fuzzy Z-numbers. Zafaranlouei N; Ghoushchi SJ; Haseli G Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(22):62121-62136. PubMed ID: 36935442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas. Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On SIR-based MCDM approach: Selecting a charcoal firm using hybrid fuzzy number on a Triple Vague structure. Rajadurai M; Kaliyaperumal P Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24248. PubMed ID: 38293499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel hybrid multi-criteria group decision-making approach with intuitionistic fuzzy sets to design reverse supply chains for COVID-19 medical waste recycling channels. Liu S; Zhang J; Niu B; Liu L; He X Comput Ind Eng; 2022 Jul; 169():108228. PubMed ID: 35601730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]