These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38488433)

  • 1. Validation of a Wearable Virtual Reality Perimeter for Glaucoma Staging, The NOVA Trial: Novel Virtual Reality Field Assessment.
    Bradley C; Ahmed IIK; Samuelson TW; Chaglasian M; Barnebey H; Radcliffe N; Bacharach J
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 13(3):10. PubMed ID: 38488433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing a head-mounted virtual reality perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer for visual field testing in healthy and glaucoma patients.
    Phu J; Wang H; Kalloniatis M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan; 44(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 37803502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a Head-mounted Virtual Reality Visual Field Screening Device.
    Mees L; Upadhyaya S; Kumar P; Kotawala S; Haran S; Rajasekar S; Friedman DS; Venkatesh R
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Feb; 29(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 31790067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Narang P; Agarwal A; Srinivasan M; Agarwal A
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun; 1(2):100035. PubMed ID: 36249304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.
    Ahmed Y; Pereira A; Bowden S; Shi RB; Li Y; Ahmed IIK; Arshinoff SA
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Virtual Reality Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Normal Children.
    Groth SL; Linton EF; Brown EN; Makadia F; Donahue SP
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 12(1):6. PubMed ID: 36598458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.
    Gupta V; Kong GXY; Singh A; Panigrahi A; Gupta S; Prea S; Vingrys AJ
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement precision in a series of visual fields acquired by the standard and fast versions of the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm: analysis of large-scale data from clinics.
    Saunders LJ; Russell RA; Crabb DP
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 25340390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Matrix with Humphrey Field Analyzer II with SITA.
    Fredette MJ; Giguère A; Anderson DR; Budenz DL; McSoley J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 25875683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.
    Lavanya R; Riyazuddin M; Dasari S; Puttaiah NK; Venugopal JP; Pradhan ZS; Devi S; Sreenivasaiah S; Ganeshrao SB; Rao HL
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Sep; 29(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 32459685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Visual Field Test Measurements With a Novel Approach on a Wearable Headset to Standard Automated Perimetry.
    Johnson C; Sayed A; McSoley J; Durbin M; Kashem R; Nicklin A; Lopez V; Mijares G; Chen M; Shaheen A; Segarra S; Rady N; Duque CA; Opoku-Baah C; Abou Shousha M
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Aug; 32(8):647-657. PubMed ID: 37311012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Static Perimetry Protocols of Central Field Testing among Patients with Glaucoma.
    Behera G; Nath A; Ramasamy A; Kaliaperumal S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Jun; 100(6):406-411. PubMed ID: 37129640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective Comparison of VisuALL Virtual Reality Perimetry and Humphrey Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma.
    Griffin JM; Slagle GT; Vu TA; Eis A; Sponsel WE
    J Curr Glaucoma Pract; 2024; 18(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 38585168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
    Newkirk MR; Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frontloading SITA-Faster Can Increase Frequency and Reliability of Visual Field Testing at Minimal Time Cost.
    Tan JCK; Kalloniatis M; Phu J
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):445-456. PubMed ID: 36958625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Visual Field Measurement with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in Patients with Ocular Hypertension.
    Kaczorowski K; Mulak M; Szumny D; Baranowska M; Jakubaszko-Jabłońska J; Misiuk-Hojło M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(5):937-944. PubMed ID: 28028959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.
    Capris P; Autuori S; Capris E; Papadia M
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual Field Evaluation Using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in Patients With Glaucoma and Healthy Individuals.
    Nasim P; Ve RS; Kuzhuppilly NIR; Naik P; Ballae Ganeshrao S; Artes PH
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Jan; 13(1):28. PubMed ID: 38289611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.