BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38488968)

  • 1. MR-contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) for follow-up of breast cancer patients: a "pros and cons" debate.
    Camps-Herrero J; Pijnappel R; Balleyguier C
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38488968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for staging of breast cancer: The pro CEM perspective.
    Lobbes MBI; Heuts EM; Moossdorff M; van Nijnatten TJA
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109883. PubMed ID: 34358810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging.
    Taylor DB; Burrows S; Saunders CM; Parizel PM; Ives A
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Feb; 7(1):8. PubMed ID: 36781808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening.
    Coffey K; Jochelson MS
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110513. PubMed ID: 36108478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening.
    Son D; Phillips J; Mehta TS; Mehta R; Brook A; Dialani VM
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S229-S238. PubMed ID: 33846061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of contrast-enhanced mammography in surgical management of breast cancers for women with dense breasts: a dual-center, multi-disciplinary study in Asia.
    Goh Y; Chou CP; Chan CW; Buhari SA; Hartman M; Tang SW; Ng CWQ; Pillay P; Chua W; Jagmohan P; Sterling E; Wong YM; Tan LY; Ong HY; Pan HB; Lee HS; Hung BH; Quek ST
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8226-8237. PubMed ID: 35788756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic evaluation of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities to mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts and average or intermediate breast cancer risk in US healthcare.
    Blankenburg M; Sánchez-Collado I; Soyemi BO; Åkerborg Ö; Caleyachetty A; Harris J; Morris E; Newstead G; Lobig F
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):850-861. PubMed ID: 37278659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Açar ÇR; Orguc S
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38777678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Use of contrast-enhanced mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Fischer U; Diekmann F; Helbich T; Preibsch H; Püsken M; Wenkel E; Wienbeck S; Fallenberg EM
    Radiologie (Heidelb); 2023 Dec; 63(12):916-924. PubMed ID: 37889284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Gelardi F; Ragaini EM; Sollini M; Bernardi D; Chiti A
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36010240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
    Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
    Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current use and future perspectives of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM): a survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
    Schiaffino S; Cozzi A; Clauser P; Giannotti E; Marino MA; van Nijnatten TJA; Baltzer PAT; Lobbes MBI; Mann RM; Pinker K; Fuchsjäger MH; Pijnappel RM;
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38227202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C
    Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast enhanced mammography in breast cancer surveillance.
    Elder K; Matheson J; Nickson C; Box G; Ellis J; Mou A; Shadbolt C; Park A; Tay J; Rose A; Mann GB
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Jun; 199(2):221-230. PubMed ID: 36966271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Are The Netherlands ready for personalized breast cancer screening? Abbreviated breast MRI and contrast-enhanced mammography for screening in women with dense breasts].
    Raat HPJ; Lobbes MBI; Veldhuis WB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2021 Jul; 165():. PubMed ID: 34346656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of MRI-Directed Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Biopsy Planning for Suspicious MRI-Detected Breast Lesions.
    Nida BA; Rooney TB; Miller MM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 36000664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An initial experience of using dual energy contrast enhanced mammography at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.
    Zeeshan S; Shafqat G; Ali D; Vohra L
    Pak J Med Sci; 2023; 39(6):1869-1874. PubMed ID: 37936732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.