These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38489216)

  • 1. Accuracy of Conventional and 3D-Printed Casts for Partial Fixed Prostheses.
    Dias Resende CC; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Piola Rizzante FA; Gonzaga LH; Januario AL; Mendonça G; das Neves FD; Zancopé K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):13-17. PubMed ID: 38489216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
    Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
    Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of 3D Printed Implant Casts Versus Stone Casts: A Comparative Study in the Anterior Maxilla.
    Banjar A; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 33474754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
    Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
    Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
    Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.
    Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts.
    Ellakany P; Al-Harbi F; El Tantawi M; Mohsen C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):438-444. PubMed ID: 33308856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensional accuracy of extrusion- and photopolymerization-based 3D printers: In vitro study comparing printed casts.
    Nestler N; Wesemann C; Spies BC; Beuer F; Bumann A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 32063385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans.
    Papaspyridakos P; Chen YW; Alshawaf B; Kang K; Finkelman M; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):589-593. PubMed ID: 31959396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows.
    Sim JY; Jang Y; Kim WC; Kim HY; Lee DH; Kim JH
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 29615324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of 3D Printed Model Acquired from Different Types of Intra Oral Scanners and 3D Printers.
    Joteppa V; Niras S; Chokhani D; Jadhao TA; Bandgar ST; Bayaskar SG
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Apr; 16(Suppl 2):S1433-S1434. PubMed ID: 38882882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.
    de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of digital implant analog design on the positional trueness of an analog in additively manufactured models: An in-vitro study.
    Mata-Mata SJ; Donmez MB; Meirelles L; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Dec; 24(6):821-830. PubMed ID: 36196856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts.
    Jang Y; Sim JY; Park JK; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 31027960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Trueness of Obturator Prosthesis Base Manufactured by Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques.
    Alfaraj A; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 34048118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible.
    Hayama H; Fueki K; Wadachi J; Wakabayashi N
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 29502933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.