These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38489222)
1. Comparison of 3D-Printed Single Crown Outcomes Among Different Computer-Aided Design Software Programs. No-Cortes J; Attard B; Mifsud DP; Lima JF; Markarian RA; Ayres AP; Cassar G; Cortes ARG; Attard NJ Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):63-70. PubMed ID: 38489222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trueness, 3D Deviation, Time and Cost Comparisons Between Milled and 3D-Printed Resin Single Crowns. No-Cortes J; Ayres AP; Lima JF; Markarian RA; Attard NJ; Cortes ARG Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2022 May; 30(2):107-112. PubMed ID: 34304395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trueness and precision of 3D-printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns: An in vitro study. Lerner H; Nagy K; Pranno N; Zarone F; Admakin O; Mangano F J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103792. PubMed ID: 34481929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns designed using three different dental CAD programs: a 3-dimensional digital analysis study. Farah RI; Alresheedi B Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):263-271. PubMed ID: 36100722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and adaptation of one-piece endodontic crowns fabricated through 3D printing and milling. Xiao P; Zheng Z; Zhang Y; Zeng Y; Yan W J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):422-433. PubMed ID: 38880678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of design software program and manufacturing method on the marginal and internal adaptation of esthetic crowns for primary teeth: A microcomputed tomography evaluation. Aktaş N; Bani M; Ocak M; Bankoğlu Güngör M J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):519.e1-519.e9. PubMed ID: 38195256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of milled and 3D-printed CAD/CAM hybrid dental crown materials with various occlusal thicknesses. Suksuphan P; Krajangta N; Didron PP; Wasanapiarnpong T; Rakmanee T J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Apr; 68(2):326-335. PubMed ID: 37438119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal and Internal Gaps, Surface Roughness and Fracture Resistance of Provisional Crowns Fabricated With 3D Printing and Milling Systems. Al-Wahadni A; Abu Rashed BO; Al-Fodeh R; Tabanjah A; Hatamleh M Oper Dent; 2023 Jul; 48(4):464-471. PubMed ID: 37352464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the accuracy of resin-composite crowns fabricated by three-dimensional printing and milling methods. Kakinuma H; Izumita K; Yoda N; Egusa H; Sasaki K Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):808-815. PubMed ID: 35793943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided design expertise affects digital wax patterns of CAD/CAM laminate veneers more than single crowns. No-Cortes J; Ayres AP; Son A; Lima JF; Markarian RA; da Silva RLB; Kim JH; Kimura RN; Cortes ARG Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Nov; 25(4):361-368. PubMed ID: 36426840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of ultrathin occlusal veneers made of 3D-printed zirconia, milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate. Ioannidis A; Park JM; Hüsler J; Bomze D; Mühlemann S; Özcan M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 33741143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. Wang W; Yu H; Liu Y; Jiang X; Gao B J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):285-291. PubMed ID: 30017167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. Sailer I; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 28024819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does cad software affect the marginal and internal fit of milled full ceramic crowns? Akat B; Şentürk A; Ocak M; Kiliçarslan MA; Özcan M Braz Oral Res; 2022; 36():e042. PubMed ID: 35293507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trueness, precision, time-efficiency and cost analysis of chairside additive and subtractive versus lab-based workflows for manufacturing single crowns: An in vitro study. Mangano FG; Cianci D; Pranno N; Lerner H; Zarone F; Admakin O J Dent; 2024 Feb; 141():104792. PubMed ID: 38013004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single crowns manufactured with an analog workflow and three CAD-CAM systems: A prospective clinical study. Sanchez-Lara A; Hosney S; Lampraki E; Conejo J; Blatz MB; Barmak AB; Ercoli C; Chochlidakis K J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 36883776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with conventional and 3D printed provisional materials. Sampaio CS; Niemann KD; Schweitzer DD; Hirata R; Atria PJ J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 32937028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Trueness of Lithium Disilicate Crowns Fabricated From All-in-One and Combination CAD/CAM Systems. Lee JJ; Son K; Bae EB; Choi JW; Lee KB; Huh JB Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(4):352-354. PubMed ID: 31283813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]