116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38489896)
1. Use of superpixels for improvement of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability during annotation of medical images.
Gut D; Trombini M; Kucybała I; Krupa K; Rozynek M; Dellepiane S; Tabor Z; Wojciechowski W
Med Image Anal; 2024 May; 94():103141. PubMed ID: 38489896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the objectivity, reliability, and validity of deep learning enabled bioimage analyses.
Segebarth D; Griebel M; Stein N; von Collenberg CR; Martin C; Fiedler D; Comeras LB; Sah A; Schoeffler V; Lüffe T; Dürr A; Gupta R; Sasi M; Lillesaar C; Lange MD; Tasan RO; Singewald N; Pape HC; Flath CM; Blum R
Elife; 2020 Oct; 9():. PubMed ID: 33074102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Segmentation of malignant gliomas through remote collaboration and statistical fusion.
Xu Z; Asman AJ; Singh E; Chambless L; Thompson R; Landman BA
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5981-9. PubMed ID: 23039636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HAL-IA: A Hybrid Active Learning framework using Interactive Annotation for medical image segmentation.
Li X; Xia M; Jiao J; Zhou S; Chang C; Wang Y; Guo Y
Med Image Anal; 2023 Aug; 88():102862. PubMed ID: 37295312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Novel Public MR Image Dataset of Multiple Sclerosis Patients With Lesion Segmentations Based on Multi-rater Consensus.
Lesjak Ž; Galimzianova A; Koren A; Lukin M; Pernuš F; Likar B; Špiclin Ž
Neuroinformatics; 2018 Jan; 16(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 29103086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation.
Warfield SK; Zou KH; Wells WM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):903-21. PubMed ID: 15250643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of image segmentation by estimating rater bias and variance.
Warfield SK; Zou KH; Wells WM
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Jul; 366(1874):2361-75. PubMed ID: 18407896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Annotation-efficient deep learning for automatic medical image segmentation.
Wang S; Li C; Wang R; Liu Z; Wang M; Tan H; Wu Y; Liu X; Sun H; Yang R; Liu X; Chen J; Zhou H; Ben Ayed I; Zheng H
Nat Commun; 2021 Oct; 12(1):5915. PubMed ID: 34625565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Convolutional neural networks for skull-stripping in brain MR imaging using silver standard masks.
Lucena O; Souza R; Rittner L; Frayne R; Lotufo R
Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():48-58. PubMed ID: 31521252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-assessed performance improves statistical fusion of image labels.
Bryan FW; Xu Z; Asman AJ; Allen WM; Reich DS; Landman BA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031903. PubMed ID: 24593721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI FLAIR lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis: Does automated segmentation hold up with manual annotation?
Egger C; Opfer R; Wang C; Kepp T; Sormani MP; Spies L; Barnett M; Schippling S
Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 13():264-270. PubMed ID: 28018853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PyMIC: A deep learning toolkit for annotation-efficient medical image segmentation.
Wang G; Luo X; Gu R; Yang S; Qu Y; Zhai S; Zhao Q; Li K; Zhang S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Apr; 231():107398. PubMed ID: 36773591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatially varying accuracy and reproducibility of prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance images using manual and semiautomated methods.
Shahedi M; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Bauman GS; Bastian-Jordan M; Gibson E; Rodrigues G; Ahmad B; Lock M; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):113503. PubMed ID: 25370674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LiverHccSeg: A publicly available multiphasic MRI dataset with liver and HCC tumor segmentations and inter-rater agreement analysis.
Gross M; Arora S; Huber S; Kücükkaya AS; Onofrey JA
Data Brief; 2023 Dec; 51():109662. PubMed ID: 37869619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole liver segmentation based on deep learning and manual adjustment for clinical use in SIRT.
Tang X; Jafargholi Rangraz E; Coudyzer W; Bertels J; Robben D; Schramm G; Deckers W; Maleux G; Baete K; Verslype C; Gooding MJ; Deroose CM; Nuyts J
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Nov; 47(12):2742-2752. PubMed ID: 32314026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new multistage medical segmentation method based on superpixel and fuzzy clustering.
Ji S; Wei B; Yu Z; Yang G; Yin Y
Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():747549. PubMed ID: 24734117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fully automated longitudinal segmentation of new or enlarged multiple sclerosis lesions using 3D convolutional neural networks.
Krüger J; Opfer R; Gessert N; Ostwaldt AC; Manogaran P; Kitzler HH; Schlaefer A; Schippling S
Neuroimage Clin; 2020; 28():102445. PubMed ID: 33038667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Infratentorial lesions in multiple sclerosis patients: intra- and inter-rater variability in comparison to a fully automated segmentation using 3D convolutional neural networks.
Krüger J; Ostwaldt AC; Spies L; Geisler B; Schlaefer A; Kitzler HH; Schippling S; Opfer R
Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2798-2809. PubMed ID: 34643779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated and manual hippocampal segmentation techniques: Comparison of results, reproducibility and clinical applicability.
Hurtz S; Chow N; Watson AE; Somme JH; Goukasian N; Hwang KS; Morra J; Elashoff D; Gao S; Petersen RC; Aisen PS; Thompson PM; Apostolova LG
Neuroimage Clin; 2019; 21():101574. PubMed ID: 30553759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of semi-automatic and deep learning-based automatic methods for liver segmentation in living liver transplant donors.
Kavur AE; Gezer NS; Barış M; Şahin Y; Özkan S; Baydar B; Yüksel U; Kılıkçıer Ç; Olut Ş; Bozdağı Akar G; Ünal G; Dicle O; Selver MA
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2020 Jan; 26(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 31904568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
