123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38491826)
21. Predicting Biopsy Outcomes During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study Risk Calculators in Five Large Active Surveillance Cohorts.
Drost FH; Nieboer D; Morgan TM; Carroll PR; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 31451332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of biopsy under-sampling and annual progression using hidden markov models to learn from prostate cancer active surveillance studies.
Li W; Denton BT; Nieboer D; Carroll PR; Roobol MJ; Morgan TM;
Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9611-9619. PubMed ID: 33159431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Refined Analysis of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics to Predict Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Outcomes.
Cooperberg MR; Brooks JD; Faino AV; Newcomb LF; Kearns JT; Carroll PR; Dash A; Etzioni R; Fabrizio MD; Gleave ME; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW; Zheng Y
Eur Urol; 2018 Aug; 74(2):211-217. PubMed ID: 29433975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Timing of Adverse Prostate Cancer Reclassification on First Surveillance Biopsy: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.
Macleod LC; Ellis WJ; Newcomb LF; Zheng Y; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Gleave ME; Lance RS; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Wei JT; Lin DW
J Urol; 2017 Apr; 197(4):1026-1033. PubMed ID: 27810448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Zhao S; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 32519915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy.
Willemse PM; Davis NF; Grivas N; Zattoni F; Lardas M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; De Santis M; Dell'Oglio P; Donaldson JF; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Gillessen S; Grummet JP; Henry AM; Liew M; MacLennan S; Mason MD; Moris L; Plass K; O'Hanlon S; Omar MI; Oprea-Lager DE; Pang KH; Paterson CC; Ploussard G; Rouvière O; Schoots IG; Tilki D; van den Bergh RCN; Van den Broeck T; van der Kwast TH; van der Poel HG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TBL
Eur Urol; 2022 Apr; 81(4):337-346. PubMed ID: 34980492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Extended followup and risk factors for disease reclassification in a large active surveillance cohort for localized prostate cancer.
Welty CJ; Cowan JE; Nguyen H; Shinohara K; Perez N; Greene KL; Chan JM; Meng MV; Simko JP; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):807-11. PubMed ID: 25261803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory biopsy in predicting progression during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.
Adamy A; Yee DS; Matsushita K; Maschino A; Cronin A; Vickers A; Guillonneau B; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):477-82. PubMed ID: 21167529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31102626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Active surveillance strategy for patients with localised prostate cancer: criteria for progression.
Thomsen FB
Dan Med J; 2015 Feb; 62(2):. PubMed ID: 25634510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.
Bul M; van den Bergh RC; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Vasarainen H; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 22928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER: ACTIVE TREATMENT OR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE?
Tomašković I
Acta Clin Croat; 2015 Sep; 54(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 26666105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.
Schenk JM; Newcomb LF; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Zhu K; Nyame YA; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Dash A; Filson CP; Gleave ME; Liss M; Martin FM; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW
J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 31651227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity With Clinical Progression Among African American and Non-Hispanic White Men Treated for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer With Active Surveillance.
Nelson TJ; Javier-DesLoges J; Deka R; Courtney PT; Nalawade V; Mell L; Murphy J; Parsons JK; Rose BS
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e219452. PubMed ID: 33999164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Active Surveillance Versus Watchful Waiting for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Model to Inform Decisions.
Loeb S; Zhou Q; Siebert U; Rochau U; Jahn B; Mühlberger N; Carter HB; Lepor H; Braithwaite RS
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 28844371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation active surveillance prostate cancer cohort: a characterisation of a prostate cancer active surveillance database.
Shah S; Beckmann K; Van Hemelrijck M; Challacombe B; Popert R; Dasgupta P; Rusere J; Zisengwe G; Elhage O; Santaolalla A
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):573. PubMed ID: 34011308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating the Four Kallikrein Panel of the 4Kscore for Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer in Men in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.
Lin DW; Newcomb LF; Brown MD; Sjoberg DD; Dong Y; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg M; Dash A; Ellis WJ; Fabrizio M; Gleave ME; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Zheng Y;
Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):448-454. PubMed ID: 27889277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Negative first follow-up prostate biopsy on active surveillance is associated with decreased risk of upgrading, suspicion of progression and converting to active treatment.
Singh S; Sandhu P; Beckmann K; Santaolalla A; Dewan K; Clovis S; Rusere J; Zisengwe G; Challacombe B; Brown C; Cathcart P; Popert R; Dasgupta P; Van Hemelrijck M; Elhage O
BJU Int; 2021 Jul; 128(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 33098158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
Jayadevan R; Felker ER; Kwan L; Barsa DE; Zhang H; Sisk AE; Delfin M; Marks LS
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911019. PubMed ID: 31509206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dietary Patterns and Risk of Gleason Grade Progression among Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Results from the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.
Schenk JM; Liu M; Neuhouser ML; Newcomb LF; Zheng Y; Zhu K; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Dash A; Ellis WJ; Filson CP; Gleave ME; Liss M; Martin FM; Morgan TM; Wagner AA; Lin DW
Nutr Cancer; 2023; 75(2):618-626. PubMed ID: 36343223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
