BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38494078)

  • 21. A Head-to-Head Analytical Comparison of Cobas 4800 HPV, PapilloCheck HPV Screening, and LMNX Genotyping Kit HPV GP for Detection of Human Papillomavirus DNA in Cervical and Cervicovaginal Swabs.
    Jaworek H; Koudelakova V; Drabek J; Vrbkova J; Zborilova B; Oborna I; Brezinova J; Marek R; Huml K; Vanek P; Hajduch M
    J Mol Diagn; 2018 Nov; 20(6):849-858. PubMed ID: 30165205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of a new HPV self-sampling device for cervical cancer screening: The Cervical and Self-Sample In Screening (CASSIS) study.
    El-Zein M; Bouten S; Louvanto K; Gilbert L; Gotlieb W; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):491-497. PubMed ID: 29678360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparability of self-collected vaginal swabs and physician-collected cervical swabs for detection of human papillomavirus infections in Rakai, Uganda.
    Safaeian M; Kiddugavu M; Gravitt PE; Ssekasanvu J; Murokora D; Sklar M; Serwadda D; Wawer MJ; Shah KV; Gray R
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Jul; 34(7):429-36. PubMed ID: 17075437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of self-collected vaginal specimens for the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus infection and the prediction of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions in a high-burden, low-resource setting.
    Toliman PJ; Kaldor JM; Badman SG; Phillips S; Tan G; Brotherton JML; Saville M; Vallely AJ; Tabrizi SN
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2019 Apr; 25(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 29906593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cervical Human Papillomavirus Testing With Two Home Self-Collection Methods Compared With a Standard Clinically Collected Sampling Method.
    McLarty JW; Williams DL; Loyd S; Hagensee ME
    Sex Transm Dis; 2019 Oct; 46(10):670-675. PubMed ID: 31517806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dry self-sampling versus provider-sampling of cervicovaginal specimens for human papillomavirus detection in the Inuit population of Nunavik, Quebec.
    Cerigo H; Coutlée F; Franco EL; Brassard P
    J Med Screen; 2012 Mar; 19(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 22438506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prevalence of type-specific human papillomavirus in endocervical, upper and lower vaginal, perineal and vaginal self-collected specimens: Implications for vaginal self-collection.
    Belinson JL; Hu S; Niyazi M; Pretorius RG; Wang H; Wen C; Smith JS; Li J; Taddeo FJ; Burchette RJ; Qiao YL
    Int J Cancer; 2010 Sep; 127(5):1151-7. PubMed ID: 20039323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can human papillomavirus DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compare with physician-collected cervical samples and cytology for cervical cancer screening in developing countries?
    Bhatla N; Dar L; Patro AR; Kumar P; Kriplani A; Gulati A; Iyer VK; Mathur SR; Sreenivas V; Shah KV; Gravitt PE
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 33(6):446-50. PubMed ID: 19931499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acceptability of self-collected vaginal samples for human papillomavirus testing for primary cervical cancer screening: comparison of face-to-face and online recruitment modes.
    Ngu SF; Lau LS; Chan CY; Ngan HY; Cheung AN; Chan KK
    BMC Public Health; 2024 Apr; 24(1):1104. PubMed ID: 38649876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Randomized comparison of vaginal self-sampling by standard vs. dry swabs for human papillomavirus testing.
    Eperon I; Vassilakos P; Navarria I; Menoud PA; Gauthier A; Pache JC; Boulvain M; Untiet S; Petignat P
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jul; 13():353. PubMed ID: 23875668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of dry vaginal self-sampling for detecting high-risk human papillomavirus infection in cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study.
    Haguenoer K; Giraudeau B; Gaudy-Graffin C; de Pinieux I; Dubois F; Trignol-Viguier N; Viguier J; Marret H; Goudeau A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Aug; 134(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 24905772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences Among Trans-Masculine Individuals: Patient-Collected Human Papillomavirus Vaginal Swabs Versus Provider-Administered Pap Tests.
    McDowell M; Pardee DJ; Peitzmeier S; Reisner SL; Agénor M; Alizaga N; Bernstein I; Potter J
    LGBT Health; 2017 Aug; 4(4):252-259. PubMed ID: 28665783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Randomized Comparison of Two Vaginal Self-Sampling Methods for Human Papillomavirus Detection: Dry Swab versus FTA Cartridge.
    Catarino R; Vassilakos P; Bilancioni A; Vanden Eynde M; Meyer-Hamme U; Menoud PA; Guerry F; Petignat P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143644. PubMed ID: 26630353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acceptance of Self-Sampling and Knowledge about Human Papillomavirus among Women in Mongolia.
    Batmunkh T; Surenjav U; Namjil N; Dorj G; Sambuu T; Amraa O
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 May; 25(5):1823-1829. PubMed ID: 38809655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Agreement for HPV genotyping detection between self-collected specimens on a FTA cartridge and clinician-collected specimens.
    Guan Y; Gravitt PE; Howard R; Eby YJ; Wang S; Li B; Feng C; Qiao YL; Castle PE
    J Virol Methods; 2013 Apr; 189(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 23370404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of self-collected vaginal, vulvar and urine samples with physician-collected cervical samples for human papillomavirus testing to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Sellors JW; Lorincz AT; Mahony JB; Mielzynska I; Lytwyn A; Roth P; Howard M; Chong S; Daya D; Chapman W; Chernesky M
    CMAJ; 2000 Sep; 163(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 11006761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Acceptability of Urine and Cervico-Vaginal Sample Self-Collection for HPV-Based Cervical Cancer Screening.
    Rohner E; McGuire FH; Liu Y; Li Q; Miele K; Desai SA; Schmitt JW; Knittel A; Nelson JAE; Edelman C; Sivaraman V; Baker A; Romocki LS; Rahangdale L; Smith JS
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 Jul; 29(7):971-979. PubMed ID: 32212991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance and pre-analytical stability of self-collected samples versus clinician cervical samples for the detection of HPV16, HPV18 and a pool of 12 other HPV types on the Roche Cobas 8800 System.
    Ilardo C; Marguerettaz M; Breton A; Azzoug T; Schmitt N; Fournier R; Bayette J; Teissier G; Lelarge C; Ponseille B
    New Microbiol; 2022 Apr; 45(2):111-114. PubMed ID: 35699559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening by high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples.
    Balasubramanian A; Kulasingam SL; Baer A; Hughes JP; Myers ER; Mao C; Kiviat NB; Koutsky LA
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Jul; 14(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 20592553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Suitability of self-collected vaginal samples for cervical cancer screening in periurban villages in Andhra Pradesh, India.
    Sowjanya AP; Paul P; Vedantham H; Ramakrishna G; Vidyadhari D; Vijayaraghavan K; Laksmi S; Sudula M; Ronnett BM; Das M; Shah KV; Gravitt PE;
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 May; 18(5):1373-8. PubMed ID: 19423518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.