161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38495338)
1. The impact of quality control on cortical morphometry comparisons in autism.
Bedford SA; Ortiz-Rosa A; Schabdach JM; Costantino M; Tullo S; Piercy T; ; Lai MC; Lombardo MV; Di Martino A; Devenyi GA; Chakravarty MM; Alexander-Bloch AF; Seidlitz J; Baron-Cohen S; Bethlehem RAI
Imaging Neurosci (Camb); 2023 Oct; 1():1-21. PubMed ID: 38495338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic comparisons of different quality control approaches applied to three large pediatric neuroimaging datasets.
Nakua H; Hawco C; Forde NJ; Joseph M; Grillet M; Johnson D; Jacobs GR; Hill S; Voineskos AN; Wheeler AL; Lai MC; Szatmari P; Georgiades S; Nicolson R; Schachar R; Crosbie J; Anagnostou E; Lerch JP; Arnold PD; Ameis SH
Neuroimage; 2023 Jul; 274():120119. PubMed ID: 37068719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cortical morphological markers in children with autism: a structural magnetic resonance imaging study of thickness, area, volume, and gyrification.
Yang DY; Beam D; Pelphrey KA; Abdullahi S; Jou RJ
Mol Autism; 2016; 7():11. PubMed ID: 26816612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative assessment of structural image quality.
Rosen AFG; Roalf DR; Ruparel K; Blake J; Seelaus K; Villa LP; Ciric R; Cook PA; Davatzikos C; Elliott MA; Garcia de La Garza A; Gennatas ED; Quarmley M; Schmitt JE; Shinohara RT; Tisdall MD; Craddock RC; Gur RE; Gur RC; Satterthwaite TD
Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():407-418. PubMed ID: 29278774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subtle in-scanner motion biases automated measurement of brain anatomy from in vivo MRI.
Alexander-Bloch A; Clasen L; Stockman M; Ronan L; Lalonde F; Giedd J; Raznahan A
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jul; 37(7):2385-97. PubMed ID: 27004471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trajectories of cortical thickness maturation in normal brain development--The importance of quality control procedures.
Ducharme S; Albaugh MD; Nguyen TV; Hudziak JJ; Mateos-Pérez JM; Labbe A; Evans AC; Karama S;
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():267-279. PubMed ID: 26463175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The LONI QC System: A Semi-Automated, Web-Based and Freely-Available Environment for the Comprehensive Quality Control of Neuroimaging Data.
Kim H; Irimia A; Hobel SM; Pogosyan M; Tang H; Petrosyan P; Blanco REC; Duffy BA; Zhao L; Crawford KL; Liew SL; Clark K; Law M; Mukherjee P; Manley GT; Van Horn JD; Toga AW
Front Neuroinform; 2019; 13():60. PubMed ID: 31555116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated search of control points in surface-based morphometry.
Canna A; Russo AG; Ponticorvo S; Manara R; Pepino A; Sansone M; Di Salle F; Esposito F
Neuroimage; 2018 Aug; 176():56-70. PubMed ID: 29673966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PREEMACS: Pipeline for preprocessing and extraction of the macaque brain surface.
Garcia-Saldivar P; Garimella A; Garza-Villarreal EA; Mendez FA; Concha L; Merchant H
Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 227():117671. PubMed ID: 33359348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of a convolutional neural network to the quality control of MRI defacing.
Delbarre DJ; Santos L; Ganjgahi H; Horner N; McCoy A; Westerberg H; Häring DA; Nichols TE; Mallon AM
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Dec; 151(Pt A):106211. PubMed ID: 36327884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qoala-T: A supervised-learning tool for quality control of FreeSurfer segmented MRI data.
Klapwijk ET; van de Kamp F; van der Meulen M; Peters S; Wierenga LM
Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():116-129. PubMed ID: 30633965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality control strategies for brain MRI segmentation and parcellation: Practical approaches and recommendations - insights from the Maastricht study.
Monereo-Sánchez J; de Jong JJA; Drenthen GS; Beran M; Backes WH; Stehouwer CDA; Schram MT; Linden DEJ; Jansen JFA
Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118174. PubMed ID: 34000406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variations in structural MRI quality significantly impact commonly used measures of brain anatomy.
Gilmore AD; Buser NJ; Hanson JL
Brain Inform; 2021 Apr; 8(1):7. PubMed ID: 33860392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface-based morphometry of the cortical architecture of autism spectrum disorders: volume, thickness, area, and gyrification.
Libero LE; DeRamus TP; Deshpande HD; Kana RK
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():1-10. PubMed ID: 25019362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating accuracy of striatal, pallidal, and thalamic segmentation methods: Comparing automated approaches to manual delineation.
Makowski C; Béland S; Kostopoulos P; Bhagwat N; Devenyi GA; Malla AK; Joober R; Lepage M; Chakravarty MM
Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 170():182-198. PubMed ID: 28259781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regional brain differences in cortical thickness, surface area and subcortical volume in individuals with Williams syndrome.
Meda SA; Pryweller JR; Thornton-Wells TA
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31913. PubMed ID: 22355403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fast qualitY conTrol meThod foR derIved diffUsion Metrics (YTTRIUM) in big data analysis: U.K. Biobank 18,608 example.
Maximov II; van der Meer D; de Lange AG; Kaufmann T; Shadrin A; Frei O; Wolfers T; Westlye LT
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Jul; 42(10):3141-3155. PubMed ID: 33788350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Open-Access European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia (EPAD) MRI dataset and processing workflow.
Lorenzini L; Ingala S; Wink AM; Kuijer JPA; Wottschel V; Dijsselhof M; Sudre CH; Haller S; Molinuevo JL; Gispert JD; Cash DM; Thomas DL; Vos SB; Prados F; Petr J; Wolz R; Palombit A; Schwarz AJ; Chételat G; Payoux P; Di Perri C; Wardlaw JM; Frisoni GB; Foley C; Fox NC; Ritchie C; Pernet C; Waldman A; Barkhof F; Mutsaerts HJMM;
Neuroimage Clin; 2022; 35():103106. PubMed ID: 35839659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the Changes of Cortical Thickness in Alzheimer Disease With MRI Using Freesurfer Software.
Sattari N; Faeghi F; Shekarchi B; Heidari MH
Basic Clin Neurosci; 2022; 13(2):185-192. PubMed ID: 36425945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding the impact of preprocessing pipelines on neuroimaging cortical surface analyses.
Bhagwat N; Barry A; Dickie EW; Brown ST; Devenyi GA; Hatano K; DuPre E; Dagher A; Chakravarty M; Greenwood CMT; Misic B; Kennedy DN; Poline JB
Gigascience; 2021 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 33481004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]