BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38495848)

  • 1. Predicting risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies using machine learning algorithms.
    Yu QY; Lin Y; Zhou YR; Yang XJ; Hemelaar J
    Front Big Data; 2024; 7():1291196. PubMed ID: 38495848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Machine Learning-Derived Prenatal Predictive Risk Model to Guide Intervention and Prevent the Progression of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus to Type 2 Diabetes: Prediction Model Development Study.
    Kumar M; Ang LT; Ho C; Soh SE; Tan KH; Chan JKY; Godfrey KM; Chan SY; Chong YS; Eriksson JG; Feng M; Karnani N
    JMIR Diabetes; 2022 Jul; 7(3):e32366. PubMed ID: 35788016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of preterm birth in nulliparous women using logistic regression and machine learning.
    Arabi Belaghi R; Beyene J; McDonald SD
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252025. PubMed ID: 34191801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Machine-learning-based prediction of pre-eclampsia using first-trimester maternal characteristics and biomarkers.
    Ansbacher-Feldman Z; Syngelaki A; Meiri H; Cirkin R; Nicolaides KH; Louzoun Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 60(6):739-745. PubMed ID: 36454636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preterm preeclampsia screening using biomarkers: combining phenotypic classifiers into robust prediction models.
    Thomas G; Syngelaki A; Hamed K; Perez-Montaño A; Panigassi A; Tuytten R; Nicolaides KH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Oct; 5(10):101110. PubMed ID: 37752025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Machine Learning Algorithm using Clinical and Demographic Data for All-Cause Preterm Birth Prediction.
    Bitar G; Liu W; Tunguhan J; Kumar KV; Hoffman MK
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e3115-e3123. PubMed ID: 38049100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining handcrafted features with latent variables in machine learning for prediction of radiation-induced lung damage.
    Cui S; Luo Y; Tseng HH; Ten Haken RK; El Naqa I
    Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2497-2511. PubMed ID: 30891794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of information theoretic feature selection and machine learning methods for the development of genetic risk prediction models.
    Jalali-Najafabadi F; Stadler M; Dand N; Jadon D; Soomro M; Ho P; Marzo-Ortega H; Helliwell P; Korendowych E; Simpson MA; Packham J; Smith CH; Barker JN; McHugh N; Warren RB; Barton A; Bowes J; ;
    Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):23335. PubMed ID: 34857774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning-based approach for predicting low birth weight.
    Ranjbar A; Montazeri F; Farashah MV; Mehrnoush V; Darsareh F; Roozbeh N
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Nov; 23(1):803. PubMed ID: 37985975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of model for prediction of placental dysfunction-related stillbirth from maternal factors, fetal weight and uterine artery Doppler at mid-gestation.
    Ashoor G; Syngelaki A; Papastefanou I; Nicolaides KH; Akolekar R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 59(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 34643306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing and comparing deep learning and machine learning algorithms for osteoporosis risk prediction.
    Qiu C; Su K; Luo Z; Tian Q; Zhao L; Wu L; Deng H; Shen H
    Front Artif Intell; 2024; 7():1355287. PubMed ID: 38919268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Logistic Regressions for Predicting Gestational Diabetes Using Routine Clinical Data: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Ye Y; Xiong Y; Zhou Q; Wu J; Li X; Xiao X
    J Diabetes Res; 2020; 2020():4168340. PubMed ID: 32626780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of Preterm Birth Using Electronic Health Record.
    Sun Q; Zou X; Yan Y; Zhang H; Wang S; Gao Y; Liu H; Liu S; Lu J; Yang Y; Ma X
    J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():9635526. PubMed ID: 35463669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and validation of predictive models for QUiPP App v.2: tool for predicting preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women.
    Watson HA; Seed PT; Carter J; Hezelgrave NL; Kuhrt K; Tribe RM; Shennan AH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):348-356. PubMed ID: 31325332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for assessing the 90-day prognostic outcome of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
    Geng Z; Yang C; Zhao Z; Yan Y; Guo T; Liu C; Wu A; Wu X; Wei L; Tian Y; Hu P; Wang K
    J Transl Med; 2024 Mar; 22(1):236. PubMed ID: 38439097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
    Khan N; Ciobanu A; Karampitsakos T; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancy by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation: data from EVENTS trial.
    Benkő Z; Wright A; Rehal A; Cimpoca B; Syngelaki A; Delgado JL; Tsokaki T; De Alvarado M; Vojtassakova D; Malligiannis Ntalianis K; Chaveeva P; Del Campo A; De Ganzo T; Resta C; Atanasova V; Accurti V; Villalain C; Aguilera J; Dojcinovska D; O'Gorman N; Plasencia W; Zingler E; Dutemeyer V; Alvar B; Casanova MC; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):257-265. PubMed ID: 33142361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Interpretable Longitudinal Preeclampsia Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning.
    Eberhard BW; Cohen RY; Rigoni J; Bates DW; Gray KJ; Kovacheva VP
    medRxiv; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37645797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpretable machine learning to predict adverse perinatal outcomes: examining marginal predictive value of risk factors during pregnancy.
    Lee SJ; Garcia GP; Stanhope KK; Platner MH; Boulet SL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Oct; 5(10):101096. PubMed ID: 37454734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Using Machine Learning Techniques: Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Oh SS; Kuang I; Jeong H; Song JY; Ren B; Moon JY; Park EC; Kawachi I
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jul; 25():e45041. PubMed ID: 37463016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.