277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38496206)
1. Evaluating and Comparing Flexure Strength of Dental Models Printed Using Fused Deposition Modelling, Digital Light Processing, and Stereolithography Apparatus Printers.
Atwal N; Bhatnagar D
Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54312. PubMed ID: 38496206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comprehensive Mechanical Examination of ABS and ABS-like Polymers Additively Manufactured by Material Extrusion and Vat Photopolymerization Processes.
Golubović Z; Danilov I; Bojović B; Petrov L; Sedmak A; Mišković Ž; Mitrović N
Polymers (Basel); 2023 Oct; 15(21):. PubMed ID: 37959878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexural Strength of 3D-Printing Resin Materials for Provisional Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Park SM; Park JM; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY
Materials (Basel); 2020 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 32911702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The flexural strength of 3D-printed provisional restorations fabricated with different resins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Saini RS; Gurumurthy V; Quadri SA; Bavabeedu SS; Abdelaziz KM; Okshah A; Alshadidi AAF; Yessayan L; Mosaddad SA; Heboyan A
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):66. PubMed ID: 38200473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study.
Rebong RE; Stewart KT; Utreja A; Ghoneima AA
Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 29509023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the suitability of fused deposition modeling to produce acrylic removable denture bases.
Alanazi KK; Wood D; Shepherd J; Stokes CW; Asencio IO
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Jun; 10(3):e880. PubMed ID: 38798134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of aging on the mechanical properties of 3-dimensional printed biocompatible resin materials used in dental applications: An in vitro study.
Topsakal KG; Aksoy M; Duran GS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Sep; 164(3):441-449. PubMed ID: 37330725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Materials Used for 3D-Printing Temporal Bone Models to Simulate Surgical Dissection.
McMillan A; Kocharyan A; Dekker SE; Kikano EG; Garg A; Huang VW; Moon N; Cooke M; Mowry SE
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Dec; 129(12):1168-1173. PubMed ID: 32363889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of Dental and Industrial 3D Printers.
Anadioti E; Kane B; Zhang Y; Bergler M; Mante F; Blatz MB
J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):30-37. PubMed ID: 35313026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Analysis of Fused Deposition Modeling and Digital Light Processing Techniques for Dimensional Accuracy in Clear Aligner Manufacturing.
Grzebieluch W; Grajzer M; Mikulewicz M
Med Sci Monit; 2023 Aug; 29():e940922. PubMed ID: 37533235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts.
Park JM; Jeon J; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 32958301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Microfluidic Performance of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Platforms.
Macdonald NP; Cabot JM; Smejkal P; Guijt RM; Paull B; Breadmore MC
Anal Chem; 2017 Apr; 89(7):3858-3866. PubMed ID: 28281349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the fused deposition modeling and the digital light processing techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy of printing dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners.
Jaber ST; Hajeer MY; Khattab TZ; Mahaini L
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2021 Aug; 7(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 33258297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clear guidance to select the most accurate technologies for 3D printing dental models - A network meta-analysis
Németh A; Vitai V; Czumbel ML; Szabó B; Varga G; Kerémi B; Hegyi P; Hermann P; Borbély J
J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104532. PubMed ID: 37120090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
Emir F; Ayyildiz S
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wear resistance and flexural properties of low force SLA- and DLP-printed splint materials in different printing orientations: An in vitro study.
Simeon P; Unkovskiy A; Saadat Sarmadi B; Nicic R; Koch PJ; Beuer F; Schmidt F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106458. PubMed ID: 38364445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of printing direction on stress distortion of three-dimensional printed dentures using stereolithography technology.
Hada T; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103949. PubMed ID: 32957241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
