BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38498161)

  • 1. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
    Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Roberge S; Demers S; Girard M; Vikhareva O; Markey S; Chaillet N; Moore L; Paris G; Bujold E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):507.e1-507.e6. PubMed ID: 26522861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.
    Budny-Winska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 33757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study.
    Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 23288683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single- versus double-layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development - the 2Close study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Stegwee SI; Jordans IPM; van der Voet LF; Bongers MY; de Groot CJM; Lambalk CB; de Leeuw RA; Hehenkamp WJK; van de Ven PM; Bosmans JE; Pajkrt E; Bakkum EA; Radder CM; Hemelaar M; van Baal WM; Visser H; van Laar JOEH; van Vliet HAAM; Rijnders RJP; Sueters M; Janssen CAH; Hermes W; Feitsma AH; Kapiteijn K; Scheepers HCJ; Langenveld J; de Boer K; Coppus SFPJ; Schippers DH; Oei ALM; Kaplan M; Papatsonis DNM; de Vleeschouwer LHM; van Beek E; Bekker MN; Huisjes AJM; Meijer WJ; Deurloo KL; Boormans EMA; van Eijndhoven HWF; Huirne JAF
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):85. PubMed ID: 30832681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.
    Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study.
    Tekiner NB; Çetin BA; Türkgeldi LS; Yılmaz G; Polat İ; Gedikbaşı A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 29397441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography.
    Budny-Wińska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2022 Jan; 31(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 34738347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sonographic evaluation of surgical repair of uterine cesarean scar defects.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Oct; 45(8):455-460. PubMed ID: 28186617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
    Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure.
    Hanacek J; Vojtech J; Urbankova I; Krcmar M; Křepelka P; Feyereisl J; Krofta L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 31441500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Halouani A; Dimassi K; Ben Mansour A; Triki A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jul; 5(7):100992. PubMed ID: 37127211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery.
    Sevket O; Ates S; Molla T; Ozkal F; Uysal O; Dansuk R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24680843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The association between uterine scar defect (niche) and the presence of symptoms.
    Mohr-Sasson A; Dadon T; Brandt A; Shats M; Axcelrod M; Meyer R; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Aug; 47(2):103221. PubMed ID: 37277298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The association between gynecological complaints and the uterine sonographic features in women with a history of cesarean section.
    Kellner H; Horky A; Louwen F; Bahlmann F; Al Naimi A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 310(1):485-491. PubMed ID: 38695973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position.
    Wang CB; Chiu WW; Lee CY; Sun YL; Lin YH; Tseng CJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 19565535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
    Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.