35 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38498703)
1. Alarms in the intensive care unit: how can the number of false alarms be reduced?
Chambrin MC
Crit Care; 2001 Aug; 5(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 11511330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors that interfere with the response of nurses in the monitoring of clinical alarms.
Dinis SM; Rabiais IC
Rev Bras Enferm; 2017; 70(1):172-179. PubMed ID: 28226057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reply to Francis: Replicability, false alarms, and walking through doorways.
Ongchoco JDK; Walter-Terrill R; Scholl BJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(13):e2401487121. PubMed ID: 38498703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of a novel postoperative monitoring system using automated Modified Early Warning Scores (MEWS) incorporating end-tidal capnography.
Blankush JM; Freeman R; McIlvaine J; Tran T; Nassani S; Leitman IM
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1081-1092. PubMed ID: 27766526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Freezing of gait is associated with a mismatch between motor imagery and motor execution in narrow doorways, not with failure to judge doorway passability.
Cohen RG; Chao A; Nutt JG; Horak FB
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Dec; 49(14):3981-8. PubMed ID: 22027173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postanesthesia monitoring revisited: frequency of true and false alarms from different monitoring devices.
Wiklund L; Hök B; Ståhl K; Jordeby-Jönsson A
J Clin Anesth; 1994; 6(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 8060626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. False alarms during patient monitoring in clinical intensive care units are highly related to poor quality of the monitored electrocardiogram signals.
Tsimenidis C; Murray A
Physiol Meas; 2016 Aug; 37(8):1383-91. PubMed ID: 27454130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Research: Association of Low-Amplitude QRSs with False-Positive Asystole Alarms.
Pelter MM; Fidler R; Hu X
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2016; 50(5):329-35. PubMed ID: 27632038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence that publication bias contaminated studies on visual event boundaries and anchoring effects.
Francis G
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(13):e2320278121. PubMed ID: 38498712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual event boundaries restrict anchoring effects in decision-making.
Ongchoco JDK; Walter-Terrill R; Scholl BJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(44):e2303883120. PubMed ID: 37874857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Excess success in articles on object-based attention.
Francis G; Thunell E
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):700-714. PubMed ID: 35233745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reevaluating excess success in psychological science.
van Boxtel JJ; Koch C
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1602-1606. PubMed ID: 26873831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. It Does Not Follow: Evaluating the One-Off Publication Bias Critiques by Francis (2012a, 2012b, 2012c, 2012d, 2012e, in press).
Simonsohn U
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):597-9. PubMed ID: 26168117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science.
Francis G
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1180-7. PubMed ID: 24638826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence that publication bias contaminated studies relating social class and unethical behavior.
Francis G
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jun; 109(25):E1587; author reply E1588. PubMed ID: 22615347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
