These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38498860)

  • 1. Accuracy of Dental Restorations Fabricated Using Milling vs 3D-Printed Molds: A Pilot Study.
    Ahlholm P; Sipilä K; Tarvonen PL; Silvast T; Lappalainen R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):79-88. PubMed ID: 38498860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs.
    Alharbi N; Alharbi S; Cuijpers VMJI; Osman RB; Wismeijer D
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 29032176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of inlay and onlay restorations based on 3D printing or milling technique - a pilot study.
    Ahlholm P; Sipilä K; Vallittu P; Kotiranta U; Lappalainen R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 May; 27(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 31046209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of ultrathin occlusal veneers made of 3D-printed zirconia, milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate.
    Ioannidis A; Park JM; Hüsler J; Bomze D; Mühlemann S; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 33741143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations.
    Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micro-CT Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Crown and Inlay Restorations Fabricated Via Different Digital Scanners belonging to the Same CAD-CAM System.
    Ekici Z; Kılıçarslan MA; Bilecenoğlu B; Ocak M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(3):381–389. PubMed ID: 33751000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fit and Strength of a Three-Unit Temporary Prosthesis Made by Different Manufacturing Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
    D'haese R; Coopman R; Vrombaut T; de Bruyn H; Vadenweghe S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 37222543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Chairside CAD/CAM Restoration Type on Marginal Fit Accuracy: A Comparison of Crown, Inlay and Onlay Restorations.
    Merrill TC; Mackey T; Luc R; Lung D; Naseem A; Abduo J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 May; 29(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 33393741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
    Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of margin discrepancy of complete gold crowns fabricated using printed, milled, and conventional hand-waxed patterns.
    Munoz S; Ramos V; Dickinson DP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 27866698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 3D-Printed Single Crown Outcomes Among Different Computer-Aided Design Software Programs.
    No-Cortes J; Attard B; Mifsud DP; Lima JF; Markarian RA; Ayres AP; Cassar G; Cortes ARG; Attard NJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):63-70. PubMed ID: 38489222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and adaptation of one-piece endodontic crowns fabricated through 3D printing and milling.
    Xiao P; Zheng Z; Zhang Y; Zeng Y; Yan W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):422-433. PubMed ID: 38880678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.
    Guess PC; Vagkopoulou T; Zhang Y; Wolkewitz M; Strub JR
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the accuracy of resin-composite crowns fabricated by three-dimensional printing and milling methods.
    Kakinuma H; Izumita K; Yoda N; Egusa H; Sasaki K
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):808-815. PubMed ID: 35793943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3D-printed versus conventionally milled zirconia for dental clinical applications: Trueness, precision, accuracy, biological and esthetic aspects.
    Alghauli M; Alqutaibi AY; Wille S; Kern M
    J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104925. PubMed ID: 38471580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.