These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38498993)

  • 1. Reference Data for a Quick Speech-in-Noise Hearing Test in the French Language.
    Bestel J; Pressnitzer D; Robier M; Rembaud F; Renard C; Leclercq F; Vincent C
    Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(5):382-397. PubMed ID: 38498993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech audiometry in noise: Development of the French-language VRB (vocale rapide dans le bruit) test.
    Leclercq F; Renard C; Vincent C
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2018 Oct; 135(5):315-319. PubMed ID: 30072287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test for Children.
    Myhrum M; Tvete OE; Heldahl MG; Moen I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 26462169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. STARR: a speech test for evaluation of the effectiveness of auditory prostheses under realistic conditions.
    Boyle PJ; Nunn TB; O'Connor AF; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 23135616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The German hearing in noise test.
    Joiko J; Bohnert A; Strieth S; Soli SD; Rader T
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Nov; 60(11):927-933. PubMed ID: 33118447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. School-Age Hearing Screening Based on Speech-in-Noise Perception Using the Digit Triplet Test.
    Denys S; Hofmann M; Luts H; Guérin C; Keymeulen A; Van Hoeck K; van Wieringen A; Hoppenbrouwers K; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1104-1115. PubMed ID: 29557793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands.
    van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):348-55. PubMed ID: 18569107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Cates WB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Griffin AM; Poissant SF; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):887-904. PubMed ID: 30418282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Wagener KC; Frachet B; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):378-87. PubMed ID: 20380611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extended High-frequency Hearing Impairment Despite a Normal Audiogram: Relation to Early Aging, Speech-in-noise Perception, Cochlear Function, and Routine Earphone Use.
    Mishra SK; Saxena U; Rodrigo H
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):822-835. PubMed ID: 34700326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.