These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38499947)
61. Comparison and Clinical Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Mandibular First Molars: An Smitha M; Paul ST; Nagaraj T; Khan AR; Rinu K J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 31883249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Randomized trial on fluorides and sealants for fissure caries prevention. Liu BY; Lo EC; Chu CH; Lin HC J Dent Res; 2012 Aug; 91(8):753-8. PubMed ID: 22736448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Effectiveness of school-based dental sealant programs among children from low-income backgrounds in France: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Muller-Bolla M; Lupi-Pégurier L; Bardakjian H; Velly AM Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 41(3):232-41. PubMed ID: 23072366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Retention of a Flowable Composite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant: One-year Follow-up. Jafarzadeh M; Malekafzali B; Tadayon N; Fallahi S J Dent (Tehran); 2010; 7(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21998768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. [Clinical effect of pit and fissure sealant used in combination with different etching adhesive and 3M-Z350 flowable resin on young permanent teeth]. Xu QL; Ji PH Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Oct; 21(5):563-5. PubMed ID: 23135189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Retention of Moisture-tolerant and Conventional Resin-based Sealant in Six- to Nine-year-old Children. Khatri SG; Samuel SR; Acharya S; Patil S; Madan K Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 26314605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Efficacy of sealing the mesial surfaces of first permanent molars with respect to the status of the distal surfaces of the second primary molars in children at high caries-risk. Gomez SS; Emilson CG; Corvalan GC; Quiroz MD; Moran MP Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Apr; 15(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 23835900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. The preventive resin (composite resin/sealant) restoration: nine-year results. Houpt M; Fukus A; Eidelman E Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 8008812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Strong evidence for the effectiveness of resin based sealants. Deery C Evid Based Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):69-70. PubMed ID: 24071670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Wear behavior of different materials used for pit and fissure sealing. Kopuz D; Yaşa B; Hatirli H Am J Dent; 2023 Dec; 36(6):281-286. PubMed ID: 38092746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Fissure sealant retention and caries development after resealing on first permanent molars of children with low, moderate and high caries risk. Oulis CJ; Berdouses ED Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Dec; 10(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 19995504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Efficacy of CO lasers in preventing dental caries in partially erupted first permanent molars: a randomized 18-month clinical trial. Brandão CB; Corona SAM; Torres CP; Côrrea-Marques AA; Saraiva MCP; Borsatto MC Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Jul; 35(5):1185-1191. PubMed ID: 31970563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial. Sharma H; Suprabha BS; Shenoy R; Rao A; Kotian H Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2023 Jun; 24(3):301-311. PubMed ID: 36947344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Clinical evaluation of giomer- and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent molars affected by molar-incisor hypomineralization: a randomized clinical trial. Özgür B; Kargın ST; Ölmez MS BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):275. PubMed ID: 35790955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Retention and caries-preventive effect of four different sealant materials: A 2-year prospective split-mouth study. Reić T; Galić T; Negovetić Vranić D Int J Paediatr Dent; 2022 Jul; 32(4):449-457. PubMed ID: 34664337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. 3-year survival rates of retained composite resin and ART sealants using two assessment criteria. Hilgert LA; Leal SC; Freire GML; Mulder J; Frencken JE Braz Oral Res; 2017 May; 31():e35. PubMed ID: 28513786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Evaluation of the marginal integrity of various pit and fissure sealants. Yaşa B; Erçin Ö; Hatırlı H J Oral Sci; 2023 Oct; 65(4):209-213. PubMed ID: 37518766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Comparative Assessment of Retention and Caries Protective Effectiveness of a Hydrophilic and a Conventional Sealant-A Clinical Trial. Beresescu L; Pacurar M; Vlasa A; Stoica AM; Dako T; Petcu B; Eșian D Children (Basel); 2022 Apr; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 35626822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Treatment of proximal superficial caries lesions on primary molar teeth with resin infiltration and fluoride varnish versus fluoride varnish only: efficacy after 1 year. Ekstrand KR; Bakhshandeh A; Martignon S Caries Res; 2010; 44(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 20090327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]