These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38500847)

  • 1. Spectral adjustment for spatial confounding.
    Guan Y; Page GL; Reich BJ; Ventrucci M; Yang S
    Biometrika; 2023 Sep; 110(3):699-719. PubMed ID: 38500847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selecting a Scale for Spatial Confounding Adjustment.
    Keller JP; Szpiro AA
    J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 2020 Jun; 183(3):1121-1143. PubMed ID: 33132544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.
    Groenwold RHH; Shofty I; Miočević M; van Smeden M; Klugkist I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 30577773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mortality and Morbidity Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Low-Level PM
    Brunekreef B; Strak M; Chen J; Andersen ZJ; Atkinson R; Bauwelinck M; Bellander T; Boutron MC; Brandt J; Carey I; Cesaroni G; Forastiere F; Fecht D; Gulliver J; Hertel O; Hoffmann B; de Hoogh K; Houthuijs D; Hvidtfeldt U; Janssen N; Jorgensen J; Katsouyanni K; Ketzel M; Klompmaker J; Hjertager Krog N; Liu S; Ljungman P; Mehta A; Nagel G; Oftedal B; Pershagen G; Peters A; Raaschou-Nielsen O; Renzi M; Rodopoulou S; Samoli E; Schwarze P; Sigsgaard T; Stafoggia M; Vienneau D; Weinmayr G; Wolf K; Hoek G
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2021 Sep; 2021(208):1-127. PubMed ID: 36106702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity analysis: distributional assumptions and confounding assumptions.
    Vanderweele TJ
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):645-9. PubMed ID: 18482060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiply robust causal inference with double-negative control adjustment for categorical unmeasured confounding.
    Shi X; Miao W; Nelson JC; Tchetgen EJT
    J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2020 Apr; 82(2):521-540. PubMed ID: 33376449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semiparametric estimation of cross-covariance functions for multivariate random fields.
    Qadir GA; Sun Y
    Biometrics; 2021 Jun; 77(2):547-560. PubMed ID: 32627169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A More Efficient Causal Mediator Model Without the No-Unmeasured-Confounder Assumption.
    Brandt H
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(4):531-552. PubMed ID: 31497999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding in causal inference based on exponential tilting and super learner.
    Zhou M; Yao W
    J Appl Stat; 2023; 50(3):744-760. PubMed ID: 36819084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing Techniques for Quantifying the Impact of Bias Due to an Unmeasured Confounder: An Applied Example.
    Barberio J; Ahern TP; MacLehose RF; Collin LJ; Cronin-Fenton DP; Damkier P; Sørensen HT; Lash TL
    Clin Epidemiol; 2021; 13():627-635. PubMed ID: 34349564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EVALUATING COSTS WITH UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING: A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR THE TREATMENT EFFECT.
    Handorf EA; Bekelman JE; Heitjan DF; Mitra N
    Ann Appl Stat; 2013; 7(4):2062-2080. PubMed ID: 24587844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity analysis of treatment effect to unmeasured confounding in observational studies with survival and competing risks outcomes.
    Huang R; Xu R; Dulai PS
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3397-3411. PubMed ID: 32677758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifiability of causal effects with multiple causes and a binary outcome.
    Kong D; Yang S; Wang L
    Biometrika; 2022 Mar; 109(1):265-272. PubMed ID: 35264813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confounder Detection in High-Dimensional Linear Models Using First Moments of Spectral Measures.
    Liu F; Chan L
    Neural Comput; 2018 Aug; 30(8):2284-2318. PubMed ID: 29894655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adjusting for unmeasured spatial confounding with distance adjusted propensity score matching.
    Papadogeorgou G; Choirat C; Zigler CM
    Biostatistics; 2019 Apr; 20(2):256-272. PubMed ID: 29365040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mediational E-values: Approximate Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Mediator-Outcome Confounding.
    Smith LH; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2019 Nov; 30(6):835-837. PubMed ID: 31348008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.
    le Cessie S
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26426943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding the impact of non-shared unmeasured confounding on the sibling comparison analysis.
    Esen BÖ; Ehrenstein V; Petersen I; Sørensen HT; Pedersen L
    Int J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 53(1):. PubMed ID: 38110565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Graphical Gaussian Process Models for Highly Multivariate Spatial Data.
    Dey D; Datta A; Banerjee S
    Biometrika; 2022 Dec; 109(4):993-1014. PubMed ID: 36643962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies.
    Lin DY; Psaty BM; Kronmal RA
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):948-63. PubMed ID: 9750244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.