150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3850104)
1. The Warnock report on human fertilization and embryology.
J Adv Nurs; 1985 Jul; 10(4):375-84. PubMed ID: 3850104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Warnock report.
Warnock M
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6489):187-90. PubMed ID: 3926117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A welcome report.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Jul; 289(6439):207-8. PubMed ID: 6430410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable.
Connor S
New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Embryo research: British Commons vote for ban.
Clarke M
Nature; 1985 Feb; 313(6004):618. PubMed ID: 11658513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report.
Gillon R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
Priest JA
Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tempest in the laboratory: medical research on spare embryos from in vitro fertilization.
Gregoratos B
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):977-1006. PubMed ID: 11655859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research.
Med World News; 1985 Apr; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues.
Bolton V; Osborn J; Servante D
J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report.
Deitch R
Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States.
Stenger RL
J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lords worry over Warnock.
Russell W
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6454):1321. PubMed ID: 11653633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The week in Plymouth:
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6487):72-3. PubMed ID: 11652446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Confused comment on Warnock.
Nature; 1984 Nov 29-Dec 5; 312(5993):389. PubMed ID: 6504148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Test-tube embryology in the dock.
Dickson D
Science; 1984 Aug; 225(4662):606. PubMed ID: 6740327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Time to break down taboos about infertility.
Templeton AA
New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):39. PubMed ID: 11658552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cloning technique 'reveals legal loophole'.
Masood E
Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):757. PubMed ID: 9039895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assisted fertilization: legal restraints proposed for UK.
Nature; 1984 Jul 26-Aug 1; 310(5975):266. PubMed ID: 6462211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
