These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38501198)
1. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for RNA-ligand complexes. Jiang D; Du H; Zhao H; Deng Y; Wu Z; Wang J; Zeng Y; Zhang H; Wang X; Wang E; Hou T; Hsieh CY Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Mar; 26(13):10323-10335. PubMed ID: 38501198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 9. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for protein-peptide complexes. Weng G; Wang E; Chen F; Sun H; Wang Z; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 May; 21(19):10135-10145. PubMed ID: 31062799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking. Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 8. Predicting binding free energies and poses of protein-RNA complexes. Chen F; Sun H; Wang J; Zhu F; Liu H; Wang Z; Lei T; Li Y; Hou T RNA; 2018 Sep; 24(9):1183-1194. PubMed ID: 29930024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking. Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):866-77. PubMed ID: 20949517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 5. Improved docking performance using high solute dielectric constant MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring. Sun H; Li Y; Shen M; Tian S; Xu L; Pan P; Guan Y; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Oct; 16(40):22035-45. PubMed ID: 25205360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 4. Accuracies of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methodologies evaluated by various simulation protocols using PDBbind data set. Sun H; Li Y; Tian S; Xu L; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Aug; 16(31):16719-29. PubMed ID: 24999761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models. Xu L; Sun H; Li Y; Wang J; Hou T J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul; 117(28):8408-21. PubMed ID: 23789789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Impacts of enhanced sampling and variable dielectric model on protein-protein Interactions. Wang E; Weng G; Sun H; Du H; Zhu F; Chen F; Wang Z; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 Sep; 21(35):18958-18969. PubMed ID: 31453590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 7. Entropy effects on the performance of end-point binding free energy calculation approaches. Sun H; Duan L; Chen F; Liu H; Wang Z; Pan P; Zhu F; Zhang JZH; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 May; 20(21):14450-14460. PubMed ID: 29785435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations. Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 21117705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and Applications in Drug Design. Wang E; Sun H; Wang J; Wang Z; Liu H; Zhang JZH; Hou T Chem Rev; 2019 Aug; 119(16):9478-9508. PubMed ID: 31244000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and Evaluation of MM/GBSA Based on a Variable Dielectric GB Model for Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. Wang E; Liu H; Wang J; Weng G; Sun H; Wang Z; Kang Y; Hou T J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5353-5365. PubMed ID: 32175734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the Performance of MM/PBSA, MM/GBSA, and QM-MM/GBSA Approaches on Protein/Carbohydrate Complexes: Effect of Implicit Solvent Models, QM Methods, and Entropic Contributions. Mishra SK; Koča J J Phys Chem B; 2018 Aug; 122(34):8113-8121. PubMed ID: 30084252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations. Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations. Wang J; Hou T J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1199-212. PubMed ID: 22497310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Case-specific performance of MM-PBSA, MM-GBSA, and SIE in virtual screening. Virtanen SI; Niinivehmas SP; Pentikäinen OT J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Nov; 62():303-318. PubMed ID: 26550792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Genheden S; Ryde U Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 May; 10(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 25835573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecular dynamics investigation on a series of HIV protease inhibitors: assessing the performance of MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA approaches. Srivastava HK; Sastry GN J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):3088-98. PubMed ID: 23121465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comprehensive Docking and MM/GBSA Rescoring Study of Ligand Recognition upon Binding Antithrombin. Zhang X; Perez-Sanchez H; Lightstone FC Curr Top Med Chem; 2017; 17(14):1631-1639. PubMed ID: 27852201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]