These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38501198)
21. Improving virtual screening results with MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring. Sahakyan H J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jun; 35(6):731-736. PubMed ID: 33983518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How Well Does the Extended Linear Interaction Energy Method Perform in Accurate Binding Free Energy Calculations? Hao D; He X; Ji B; Zhang S; Wang J J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6624-6633. PubMed ID: 33213150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of affinity ranking using AutoDock-GPU and MM-GBSA scores for BACE-1 inhibitors in the D3R Grand Challenge 4. El Khoury L; Santos-Martins D; Sasmal S; Eberhardt J; Bianco G; Ambrosio FA; Solis-Vasquez L; Koch A; Forli S; Mobley DL J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1011-1020. PubMed ID: 31691919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment. Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3. He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization. Liu J; He X; Zhang JZ J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 23651068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. D3R Grand Challenge 4: ligand similarity and MM-GBSA-based pose prediction and affinity ranking for BACE-1 inhibitors. Sasmal S; El Khoury L; Mobley DL J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Feb; 34(2):163-177. PubMed ID: 31781990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors. Ferrari AM; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M; Rastelli G Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7865-77. PubMed ID: 17870536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses. Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How Good Are Current Docking Programs at Nucleic Acid-Ligand Docking? A Comprehensive Evaluation. Jiang D; Zhao H; Du H; Deng Y; Wu Z; Wang J; Zeng Y; Zhang H; Wang X; Wu J; Hsieh CY; Hou T J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Aug; 19(16):5633-5647. PubMed ID: 37480347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power. Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing. Graves AP; Shivakumar DM; Boyce SE; Jacobson MP; Case DA; Shoichet BK J Mol Biol; 2008 Mar; 377(3):914-34. PubMed ID: 18280498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations. Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prediction of the Binding Affinities and Selectivity for CB1 and CB2 Ligands Using Homology Modeling, Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and MM-PBSA Binding Free Energy Calculations. Ji B; Liu S; He X; Man VH; Xie XQ; Wang J ACS Chem Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 11(8):1139-1158. PubMed ID: 32196303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predicting fragment binding poses using a combined MCSS MM-GBSA approach. Haider MK; Bertrand HO; Hubbard RE J Chem Inf Model; 2011 May; 51(5):1092-105. PubMed ID: 21528911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies. Genheden S; Ryde U Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating the performance of MM/PBSA for binding affinity prediction using class A GPCR crystal structures. Yau MQ; Emtage AL; Chan NJY; Doughty SW; Loo JSE J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 May; 33(5):487-496. PubMed ID: 30989574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA. Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA. Rastelli G; Del Rio A; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M J Comput Chem; 2010 Mar; 31(4):797-810. PubMed ID: 19569205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comprehensive evaluation of end-point free energy techniques in carboxylated-pillar[6]arene host-guest binding: II. regression and dielectric constant. Liu X; Zheng L; Cong Y; Gong Z; Yin Z; Zhang JZH; Liu Z; Sun Z J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Dec; 36(12):879-894. PubMed ID: 36394776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]