153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38502888)
1. Early vs. delayed mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.
Buda KG; Hryniewicz K; Eckman PM; Basir MB; Cowger JA; Alaswad K; Mukundan S; Sandoval Y; Elliott A; Brilakis ES; Megaly MS
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2024 May; 13(5):390-397. PubMed ID: 38502888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock due to ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Analysis of the National Readmissions Database.
Briasoulis A; Kampaktsis P; Emfietzoglou M; Kuno T; Van den Eynde J; Ntalianis A; Duque ER; Malik AH
Angiology; 2023 Jan; 74(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 35440216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
Enezate T; Eniezat M; Thomas J
Am J Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 124(4):505-510. PubMed ID: 31204034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of survival and ability to wean from short-term mechanical circulatory support device following acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Garan AR; Eckhardt C; Takeda K; Topkara VK; Clerkin K; Fried J; Masoumi A; Demmer RT; Trinh P; Yuzefpolskaya M; Naka Y; Burkhoff D; Kirtane A; Colombo PC; Takayama H
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2018 Dec; 7(8):755-765. PubMed ID: 29094607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence of temporary mechanical circulatory support before heart transplantation and impact on post-transplant outcomes.
Ouyang D; Gulati G; Ha R; Banerjee D
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2018 Sep; 37(9):1060-1066. PubMed ID: 29907499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential Prognostic Implications of Vasoactive Inotropic Score for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock According to Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Choi KH; Yang JH; Park TK; Lee JM; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Ko YG; Yu CW; Chun WJ; Jang WJ; Kim HJ; Bae JW; Kwon SU; Lee HJ; Lee WS; Jeong JO; Park SD; Cho S; Gwon HC
Crit Care Med; 2021 May; 49(5):770-780. PubMed ID: 33590998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiogenic Shock in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction: An 8-Year National Perspective on Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes.
Vallabhajosyula S; Dunlay SM; Murphree DH; Barsness GW; Sandhu GS; Lerman A; Prasad A
JACC Heart Fail; 2019 Jun; 7(6):469-476. PubMed ID: 31078481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospital mortality and thirty day readmission among patients with non-acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
Shah M; Patel B; Tripathi B; Agarwal M; Patnaik S; Ram P; Patil S; Shin J; Jorde UP
Int J Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 270():60-67. PubMed ID: 29929933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Cohen DJ; Yeh RW
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007270. PubMed ID: 30608880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical circulatory support for early surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defect with cardiogenic shock.
Vondran M; Wehbe MS; Etz C; Ghazy T; Rastan AJ; Borger MA; Schroeter T
Artif Organs; 2021 Mar; 45(3):244-253. PubMed ID: 32857884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. US trends of in-hospital morbidity and mortality for acute myocardial infarctions complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Koester M; Dangl M; Albosta M; Grant J; Maning J; Colombo R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Jul; 64():44-51. PubMed ID: 38378376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obesity and Outcomes Following Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Sreenivasan J; Khan MS; Sharedalal P; Hooda U; Fudim M; Demmer RT; Yuzefpolskaya M; Ahmad H; Khan SS; Lanier GM; Colombo PC; Rich JD
Circ Heart Fail; 2021 Mar; 14(3):e007937. PubMed ID: 33706552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Ouweneel DM; Eriksen E; Sjauw KD; van Dongen IM; Hirsch A; Packer EJ; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Lagrand WK; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Henriques JP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 27810347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Sepsis-Associated Cardiogenic Shock With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Sato R; Hasegawa D; Guo SC; Nishida K; Dugar S
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2024 Jan; 38(1):207-213. PubMed ID: 37852913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes with temporary mechanical circulatory support before minimally invasive centrifugal left ventricular assist device.
Sorensen EN; Griffith BP; Feller ED; Kaczorowski DJ
J Card Surg; 2020 Jul; 35(7):1539-1547. PubMed ID: 32579786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience.
Ouweneel DM; de Brabander J; Karami M; Sjauw KD; Engström AE; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Beijk MA; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Lagrand WK; Cherpanath TG; Driessen AH; Cocchieri R; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Henriques JP
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2019 Jun; 8(4):338-349. PubMed ID: 30403366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
