These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38503062)

  • 1. Markerless motion capture provides accurate predictions of ground reaction forces across a range of movement tasks.
    Lichtwark GA; Schuster RW; Kelly LA; Trost SG; Bialkowski A
    J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():112051. PubMed ID: 38503062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement between a markerless and a marker-based motion capture systems for balance related quantities.
    Chaumeil A; Lahkar BK; Dumas R; Muller A; Robert T
    J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 165():112018. PubMed ID: 38412623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements.
    Song K; Hullfish TJ; Scattone Silva R; Silbernagel KG; Baxter JR
    J Biomech; 2023 Aug; 157():111751. PubMed ID: 37552921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whole-body biomechanical load in running-based sports: The validity of estimating ground reaction forces from segmental accelerations.
    Verheul J; Gregson W; Lisboa P; Vanrenterghem J; Robinson MA
    J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Jun; 22(6):716-722. PubMed ID: 30594457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions.
    Kanko RM; Outerleys JB; Laende EK; Selbie WS; Deluzio KJ
    J Appl Biomech; 2024 Apr; 40(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 38237574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Running ground reaction forces across footwear conditions are predicted from the motion of two body mass components.
    Udofa AB; Clark KP; Ryan LJ; Weyand PG
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2019 May; 126(5):1315-1325. PubMed ID: 30763160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lower limb joint motion and muscle force in treadmill and over-ground exercise.
    Yao J; Guo N; Xiao Y; Li Z; Li Y; Pu F; Fan Y
    Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Aug; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 31438944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Both a single sacral marker and the whole-body center of mass accurately estimate peak vertical ground reaction force in running.
    Patoz A; Lussiana T; Breine B; Gindre C; Malatesta D
    Gait Posture; 2021 Sep; 89():186-192. PubMed ID: 34325223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture.
    Kanko RM; Laende EK; Davis EM; Selbie WS; Deluzio KJ
    J Biomech; 2021 Oct; 127():110665. PubMed ID: 34380101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Force measurements during running on different instrumented treadmills.
    Asmussen MJ; Kaltenbach C; Hashlamoun K; Shen H; Federico S; Nigg BM
    J Biomech; 2019 Feb; 84():263-268. PubMed ID: 30621957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Principal component analysis of whole-body kinematics using markerless motion capture during static balance tasks.
    Eveleigh KJ; Deluzio KJ; Scott SH; Laende EK
    J Biomech; 2023 May; 152():111556. PubMed ID: 37004391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements.
    Song K; Hullfish TJ; Silva RS; Silbernagel KG; Baxter JR
    bioRxiv; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36865211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of 3D Markerless Motion Capture Accuracy Using OpenPose With Multiple Video Cameras.
    Nakano N; Sakura T; Ueda K; Omura L; Kimura A; Iino Y; Fukashiro S; Yoshioka S
    Front Sports Act Living; 2020; 2():50. PubMed ID: 33345042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint kinematics and ground reaction forces in overground versus treadmill graded running.
    Firminger CR; Vernillo G; Savoldelli A; Stefanyshyn DJ; Millet GY; Edwards WB
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():109-113. PubMed ID: 29729612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Change the direction: 3D optimal control simulation by directly tracking marker and ground reaction force data.
    Nitschke M; Marzilger R; Leyendecker S; Eskofier BM; Koelewijn AD
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14852. PubMed ID: 36778146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Jumping towards field-based ground reaction force estimation and assessment with OpenCap.
    Verheul J; Robinson MA; Burton S
    J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():112044. PubMed ID: 38461742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of gait kinetics using Markerless-driven musculoskeletal modeling.
    Ripic Z; Theodorakos I; Andersen MS; Signorile JF; Best TM; Jacobs KA; Eltoukhy M
    J Biomech; 2023 Aug; 157():111712. PubMed ID: 37421911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study.
    Kluitenberg B; Bredeweg SW; Zijlstra S; Zijlstra W; Buist I
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Nov; 13():235. PubMed ID: 23186326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical loading prediction through accelerometry data during walking and running.
    Veras L; Diniz-Sousa F; Boppre G; Resende-Coelho A; Moutinho-Ribeiro E; Devezas V; Santos-Sousa H; Preto J; Vilas-Boas JP; Machado L; Oliveira J; Fonseca H
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Aug; 23(8):1518-1527. PubMed ID: 35838070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces and Sagittal Knee Kinematics During Running Using Three Inertial Sensors.
    Wouda FJ; Giuberti M; Bellusci G; Maartens E; Reenalda J; van Beijnum BF; Veltink PH
    Front Physiol; 2018; 9():218. PubMed ID: 29623042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.