137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38503382)
1. Digital versus speculum insertion of Foley catheter for labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Baradwan S; Alshahrani MS; AlSghan R; Sabban H; Khadawardi K; Alyafi M; Hafedh B; Alayed NM; Rashed ZF; Abdel-Hakam FA; Elshabrawi MN; Abdelhakim AM; Ahmed WE
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 53(5):102770. PubMed ID: 38503382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of digital and speculum-guided methods of transcervical Foley catheter insertion in primigravida undergoing cervical ripening at term gestation: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial.
Maheshwari A; Jha N; Chaturvedula L
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Apr; 6(4):101349. PubMed ID: 38490333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speculum versus digital insertion of Foley catheter for induction of labor in Nulliparas with unripe cervix: a randomized controlled trial.
Chia HM; Tan PC; Tan SP; Hamdan M; Omar SZ
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 May; 20(1):330. PubMed ID: 32471369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital vs speculum-guided catheter balloon insertion for cervical ripening in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.
Abu Shqara R; Nakhleh Francis Y; Haj H; Markdorf S; Lowenstein L; Frank Wolf M
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100943. PubMed ID: 36972835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Six compared with 12 hours of Foley balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervices: a randomized controlled trial.
Appadurai U; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101157. PubMed ID: 37722505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial.
Kamarudzman N; Omar SZ; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101142. PubMed ID: 37643690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Foley Bulb Insertion by Blind Placement Compared With Direct Visualization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kuhlmann MJ; Spencer N; Garcia-Jasso C; Singh P; Abdelwahab M; Vaughn M; Marshall K; Prasad N; Soulsby-Monroy R; Saade GR; Saad AF
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 137(1):139-145. PubMed ID: 33278290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of pain in women randomly allocated to speculum or digital insertion of the Foley catheter for induction of labor.
Jonsson M; Hellgren C; Wiberg-Itzel E; Akerud H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Sep; 90(9):997-1004. PubMed ID: 21615714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of labor via Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unfavorable cervices: a randomized controlled trial.
Yogamoorthy U; Saaid R; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101158. PubMed ID: 37734661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital insertion of Foley catheter 16F versus 22F versus 28F in unripe cervix labor induction: A randomized trial.
Lim BK; Zakaria R; Hong JGS; Omar SZ; Sulaiman S; Tan PC
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Mar; 48(3):694-702. PubMed ID: 35068018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.
Sayed Ahmed WA; Ibrahim ZM; Ashor OE; Mohamed ML; Ahmed MR; Elshahat AM
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27436681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.
Lajusticia H; Martínez-Domínguez SJ; Pérez-Roncero GR; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 29445926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outpatient cervical ripening: discomfort/pain during speculum and Foley catheter insertion.
Gidaszewski B; Khajehei M; McGee T
Midwifery; 2018 Dec; 67():57-63. PubMed ID: 30248552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intracervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for labor induction with Bishop score ≤3: a secondary analysis.
Gagnon J; Corlin T; Berghella V; Hoffman MK; Sciscione A; Marie PS; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jul; 3(4):100350. PubMed ID: 33757937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of mechanical and nonmechanical methods of cervix ripening in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
Mokhtarpour S; Sahhaf F; Vahedi L; Sani A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Apr; 5(4):100868. PubMed ID: 36690182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outpatient vs inpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in multiparas with unripe cervixes: A randomized trial.
Hamdan M; Shuhaina S; Hong JGS; Vallikkannu N; Zaidi SN; Tan YP; Tan PC
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Nov; 100(11):1977-1985. PubMed ID: 34462906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study.
Solt I; Frank Wolf M; Ben-Haroush S; Kaminskyi S; Ophir E; Bornstein J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Apr; 34(7):1034-1041. PubMed ID: 31185762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foley catheter placement for induction of labor with or without stylette: a randomized clinical trial.
Forgie MM; Greer DM; Kram JJ; Vander Wyst KB; Salvo NP; Siddiqui DS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):397.e1-397.e10. PubMed ID: 26723197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
