144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38503594)
1. RE: "Will ChatGPT take over the manuscript review process?".
Daungsupawong H; Wiwanitkit V
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2024; 18(4):420. PubMed ID: 38503594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer Review Process, Editorial Decisions, and Manuscript Resubmission: A Reference for Novice Researchers.
Lusher AD
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2015 Sep; 115(9):566-9. PubMed ID: 26322935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
Elmore SA
Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process.
Brazeau GA; Dipiro JT; Fincham JE; Boucher BA; Tracy TS
Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Jun; 72(3):69. PubMed ID: 18698392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Getting Published: A Primer on Manuscript Writing and the Editorial Process.
Fisher PG; Goodman DM; Long SS
J Pediatr; 2017 Jun; 185():241-244. PubMed ID: 28341526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Does it take too much time to publish in the JPD? - Our peer-review process.
Rosenstiel S
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):987. PubMed ID: 38714455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial: peer review and the editorial process--a look behind the curtain.
Leopold SS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 25352264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Waste not, want not.
Rockman HA
J Clin Invest; 2014 Feb; 124(2):463. PubMed ID: 24487638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On publication of a manuscript: the author, the reviewer and the editor.
Tonkin M
Hand Surg; 2013; 18(3):ix-x. PubMed ID: 24156598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What should not be in a manuscript submitted to a scientific journal.
Caon M
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Jun; 38(2):203-4. PubMed ID: 26025011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ideas regarding developing, submitting, reviewing, and publishing a scientific manuscript: an editor's perspective.
Apuzzo ML
World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(3-4):443-6. PubMed ID: 24720909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Does "Decision Fatigue" Impact Manuscript Acceptance? An Analysis of Editorial Decisions by the American Journal of Gastroenterology.
Kwan J; Stein L; Delshad S; Johl S; Park H; Martinez B; Topp L; Spiegel BM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 111(11):1511-1512. PubMed ID: 27725653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [From a manuscript to an article in Tidsskriftet].
Ringnes A
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 16397648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The manuscript review process.
Triadafilopoulos G
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A peer into the process..
Huynh K
J Wound Care; 2014 Jan; 23(1):3. PubMed ID: 24406538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing.
Robertson M
BMC Biol; 2013 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 23445866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The need for the persons involved as reviewers in the peer-review system to disclose potential conflicts of interest regarding the manuscript or the authors.
Murphy EJ
Lipids; 2008 Feb; 43(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 18236093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [From paper to Internet-based manuscript submission].
Schroeder TV; Kitaj T
Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Jan; 167(1):25. PubMed ID: 15675159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
Clarke SP
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Demystifying the Journal Submission, Peer Review, and Publication Process.
Likis FE; Swett B
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2019 Mar; 64(2):145-148. PubMed ID: 30920139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
