165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38503646)
1. Accuracy of Dolphin Imaging software in predicting soft tissue changes of Class II Division 1 incisor relationship treated by all first premolar extraction compared with post-treatment lateral cephalogram.
Maniyar N; Prakash AT; Kumar HCK; Yavagal PC
J World Fed Orthod; 2024 Jun; 13(3):128-135. PubMed ID: 38503646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of computer-aided prediction in soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment.
Zhang X; Mei L; Yan X; Wei J; Li Y; Li H; Li Z; Zheng W; Li Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 31784016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares.
Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study.
Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH
Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Dolphin visual treatment objective (VTO) prediction software on class III patients treated with maxillary advancement and mandibular setback.
Peterman RJ; Jiang S; Johe R; Mukherjee PM
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):19. PubMed ID: 27312722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy in predicting soft tissue changes of orthodontic class III cases using Dolphin® software.
Xing K; Mei H; Feng Q; Quan S; Zhang G; Jia A; Ge H; Mei D; Li J
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Aug; 27(8):4531-4539. PubMed ID: 37285103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment.
Tadic N; Woods MG
Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 17685775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Facial soft-tissue shape changes after fixed edgewise treatment with premolar extraction in individual artificial-intelligence-classified facial profile patterns.
Tanikawa C; Tan TJ; Takada K
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):740. PubMed ID: 38937790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extraction vs no treatment: Long-term facial profile changes.
Rathod AB; Araujo E; Vaden JL; Behrents RG; Oliver DR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 25919105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [
Zhou ZJ; Chen Y; Lin YJ; Sun YT; Wang TG; Mao LX; Liu JQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 34645237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Soft and hard tissue changes of hyperdivergent class Ⅱ patients before and after orthodontic extraction treatment].
Mao B; Tian Y; Wang X; Li J; Zhou Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Feb; 56(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 38318905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of three-dimensional perioral soft tissue changes in dentoalveolar protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment using a structured light scanner.
Ahn HW; Chang YJ; Kim KA; Joo SH; Park YG; Park KH
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):795-802. PubMed ID: 24611593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Post-orthodontic cephalometric variations in bimaxillary protrusion cases managed by premolar extraction - A retrospective study.
Alqahtani ND; Alshammari R; Almoammar K; Almosa N; Almahdy A; Albarakati SF
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1530-1538. PubMed ID: 31719274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic retraction of incisors in Iranian girls.
Sodagar A; Borujeni DG; Amini G
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 20877736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction accuracy of Dolphin software for soft-tissue profile in Class I patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment.
Soheilifar S; Soheilifar S; Afrasiabi Z; Soheilifar S; Tapak L; Naghdi N
J World Fed Orthod; 2022 Feb; 11(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 34728153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system.
Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
Georgalis K; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lip curve changes in males with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment.
Lin PT; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):71-86. PubMed ID: 16429877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.
Magro-Filho O; Magro-Ernica N; Queiroz TP; Aranega AM; Garcia IR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. PubMed ID: 20362896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
