These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38503646)
1. Accuracy of Dolphin Imaging software in predicting soft tissue changes of Class II Division 1 incisor relationship treated by all first premolar extraction compared with post-treatment lateral cephalogram. Maniyar N; Prakash AT; Kumar HCK; Yavagal PC J World Fed Orthod; 2024 Jun; 13(3):128-135. PubMed ID: 38503646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of computer-aided prediction in soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Zhang X; Mei L; Yan X; Wei J; Li Y; Li H; Li Z; Zheng W; Li Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 31784016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares. Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study. Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Dolphin visual treatment objective (VTO) prediction software on class III patients treated with maxillary advancement and mandibular setback. Peterman RJ; Jiang S; Johe R; Mukherjee PM Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):19. PubMed ID: 27312722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy in predicting soft tissue changes of orthodontic class III cases using Dolphin® software. Xing K; Mei H; Feng Q; Quan S; Zhang G; Jia A; Ge H; Mei D; Li J Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Aug; 27(8):4531-4539. PubMed ID: 37285103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment. Tadic N; Woods MG Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 17685775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Network analysis of three-dimensional hard-soft tissue relationships in the lower 1/3 of the face: skeletal Class I-normodivergent malocclusion versus Class II-hyperdivergent malocclusion. Wang T; Nie K; Fan Y; Chen G; Xu K; Han B; Pei Y; Song G; Xu T BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):996. PubMed ID: 39182104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facial soft-tissue shape changes after fixed edgewise treatment with premolar extraction in individual artificial-intelligence-classified facial profile patterns. Tanikawa C; Tan TJ; Takada K BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):740. PubMed ID: 38937790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extraction vs no treatment: Long-term facial profile changes. Rathod AB; Araujo E; Vaden JL; Behrents RG; Oliver DR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 25919105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soft-tissue profile changes in adult patients treated with premolar extractions. Albertini P; Barbara L; Albertini E; Willeit P; Lombardo L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Aug; 166(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 38762811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [ Zhou ZJ; Chen Y; Lin YJ; Sun YT; Wang TG; Mao LX; Liu JQ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 34645237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Soft and hard tissue changes of hyperdivergent class Ⅱ patients before and after orthodontic extraction treatment]. Mao B; Tian Y; Wang X; Li J; Zhou Y Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Feb; 56(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 38318905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of three-dimensional perioral soft tissue changes in dentoalveolar protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment using a structured light scanner. Ahn HW; Chang YJ; Kim KA; Joo SH; Park YG; Park KH Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):795-802. PubMed ID: 24611593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic retraction of incisors in Iranian girls. Sodagar A; Borujeni DG; Amini G World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 20877736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction accuracy of Dolphin software for soft-tissue profile in Class I patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Soheilifar S; Soheilifar S; Afrasiabi Z; Soheilifar S; Tapak L; Naghdi N J World Fed Orthod; 2022 Feb; 11(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 34728153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system. Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery. Georgalis K; Woods MG Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]