These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38503646)

  • 21. A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part II: Results.
    Cummins DM; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jul; 108(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 7598103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Extraction versus non-extraction: evaluation by digital subtraction radiography.
    Akyalçin S; Hazar S; Güneri P; Gögüs S; Erdinç AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):639-47. PubMed ID: 17906308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of two imaging programs in predicting the soft tissue changes with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Ravindranath S; Krishnaswamy NR; Sundaram V
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 22299108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy.
    Scott Conley R; Jernigan C
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16448270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults.
    Hayashida H; Ioi H; Nakata S; Takahashi I; Counts AL
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 20966067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Lip profile changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion of varied growth patterns treated with maxillary premolar extractions: A pilot study.
    Mishra D; Natarajan M; Urala AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Nov; 158(5):684-693. PubMed ID: 33010980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Soft tissue changes of chin with different premolar extraction patterns].
    Zhang SF; Lin XP; Zheng ML
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Oct; 18(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 19907851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prediction of lip response to four first premolar extractions in white female adolescents and adults.
    Hodges A; Rossouw PE; Campbell PM; Boley JC; Alexander RA; Buschang PH
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):413-21. PubMed ID: 19413391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How accurate is the soft tissue prediction of Dolphin Imaging for orthognathic surgery?
    van Twisk PH; Tenhagen M; Gül A; Wolvius E; Koudstaal M
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):488-496. PubMed ID: 31296487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue predictions in orthognathic surgery after Le Fort I advancement osteotomies.
    Ullah R; Turner PJ; Khambay BS
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 53(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 25432431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Upper lip changes correlated to maxillary incisor retraction--a metallic implant study.
    Ramos AL; Sakima MT; Pinto Ados S; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 16097216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities.
    Yashwant V A; K R; Arumugam E
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(4):50-9. PubMed ID: 27653264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jakobsen JR; Zaher AR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 7817959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of modified twin block appliance in growing Class II high angle cases: A cephalometric study.
    Jha K; Adhikari M
    F1000Res; 2022; 11():459. PubMed ID: 38680231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Over-bite and vertical changes following first premolar extraction in high angle cases.
    Ramesh GC; Pradeep MC; Kumar GA; Girish KS; Suresh BS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):812-8. PubMed ID: 23404008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of premolar extractions on long-term adult facial aesthetics and apparent age.
    Janson G; Junqueira CH; Mendes LM; Garib DG
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 26070924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mandibular setback osteotomy: facial soft tissue behavior and possibility to improve the accuracy of the soft tissue profile prediction with the use of a computerized cephalometric program: Quick Ceph Image Pro: v. 2.5.
    Chunmaneechote P; Friede H
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 May; 2(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 10534984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Feb; 107(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 7847270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.